Anonymous
Post 09/26/2017 08:28     Subject: Why hrc was right about white women - and their husbands
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I question a thread whose title alludes to which Hillary Rodham Clinton (aka HRC) commenting on the relationships of white women and their husbands. She hardly qualifies as an expert on marital relationships!

I also wonder what the OP thinks of husbands in Germany, Croatia, Estonia, Lithuania, Norway, Poland, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom who couldn't stop their wives from electing a qualified person (albeit a white woman) to run their countries.

I voted for a biracial man for President twice; I voted for a white woman for President not once. It wasn't "a woman"; it was "that woman."

If you don't chose to believe it, so be it.

Keep your pink pussy hats and your delusions. You will need them when a qualified woman becomes President of the United States in 2020.

Our first woman president will be Nikki Haley, in 2024. Mark this post.


Completely agree. She is the first US UN Ambassador who has made something of the post, and will be our next Secretary of State, then the Presidency. And she will do it in the way that helped her create a successful business, become a governor, and then UN Ambassador. No riding on her husband's coattails; no shouts of sexism, racism, deplorables. She will get it done like women have done forever.
Anonymous
Post 09/26/2017 08:26     Subject: Why hrc was right about white women - and their husbands
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:00:58, 06:38, 07:03, 07:11 are the same troll.


Nice try. I posted one of those - and not the others.
Looks like your clairvoyant ability is on the fritz.

“Troll” seems to be synonymous with “I disagree so I will try to discredit the post.”

Unfortunately, it's what they do. It is an improvement over Nazi and racist, though.
Anonymous
Post 09/26/2017 08:24     Subject: Why hrc was right about white women - and their husbands
Anonymous wrote:00:58, 06:38, 07:03, 07:11 are the same troll.


Nice try. I posted one of those - and not the others.
Looks like your clairvoyant ability is on the fritz.

“Troll” seems to be synonymous with “I disagree so I will try to discredit the post.”
Anonymous
Post 09/26/2017 08:23     Subject: Why hrc was right about white women - and their husbands
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Wait...so you're saying that women can't be strong, independent and just as capable as men?

I have a better answer - and this is by talking to white women and not some article from a left leaning British paper.

Most are tired of the "check your white privilege" bullshit too. They're being picked on and picked out for being oppressive for merely being white. They're sick of it. They're also sick of the media and the left constantly berating their hard working husbands, soms and brothers who happen to be white, or a cop, of a military member or maybe their husbands are all of the aforementioned groups. I know white women with Latino husbands who voted for Trump. Why? They're called out for being impressive when they're married to say - a Cuban immigrant.

Bit hopefully the left keeps it up, they're ensuring Trump's second term.


No. It's not merely for being white. It's for being white and not caring about people who aren't white.


And? People care about what affects them directly. Does the plight of the Karen's a concern for the average black American?
Anonymous
Post 09/26/2017 08:18     Subject: Why hrc was right about white women - and their husbands
Anonymous wrote:I question a thread whose title alludes to which Hillary Rodham Clinton (aka HRC) commenting on the relationships of white women and their husbands. She hardly qualifies as an expert on marital relationships!

I also wonder what the OP thinks of husbands in Germany, Croatia, Estonia, Lithuania, Norway, Poland, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom who couldn't stop their wives from electing a qualified person (albeit a white woman) to run their countries.

I voted for a biracial man for President twice; I voted for a white woman for President not once. It wasn't "a woman"; it was "that woman."

If you don't chose to believe it, so be it.

Keep your pink pussy hats and your delusions. You will need them when a qualified woman becomes President of the United States in 2020.

Our first woman president will be Nikki Haley, in 2024. Mark this post.
Anonymous
Post 09/26/2017 08:14     Subject: Why hrc was right about white women - and their husbands
I question a thread whose title alludes to which Hillary Rodham Clinton (aka HRC) commenting on the relationships of white women and their husbands. She hardly qualifies as an expert on marital relationships!

I also wonder what the OP thinks of husbands in Germany, Croatia, Estonia, Lithuania, Norway, Poland, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom who couldn't stop their wives from electing a qualified person (albeit a white woman) to run their countries.

I voted for a biracial man for President twice; I voted for a white woman for President not once. It wasn't "a woman"; it was "that woman."

If you don't chose to believe it, so be it.

Keep your pink pussy hats and your delusions. You will need them when a qualified woman becomes President of the United States in 2020.
Anonymous
Post 09/26/2017 08:11     Subject: Why hrc was right about white women - and their husbands
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:00:58, 06:38, 07:03, 07:11 are the same troll.


And 07:39, back from trolling other threads.

Any time you disagree with someone, you call them a troll? Maybe they just don't share your liberal views.


Yes, the uneducated of both sexs voted against there own interests for a snake oil salesman. More people still voted for Clinton.

CLINTON TRUMP
White men 31% 63%
White women 43 53
White women college graduates 51 45
White women non-college graduates 34 62
White men college graduates 39 54
White men non-college graduates 23 72
White women without college degrees chose Trump
SOURCE: EDISON RESEARCH EXIT POLLS

Why are these results surprising? You seem to be saying that uneducated people are stupid (typical elitist), while the fact is that the white working class had been saying that they were tired of being ignored by Democrats. Hillary demonstrated that she would continue to do more of the same by ignoring the swing states (she skipped WI entirely) in order to pander to blacks and other minorities while hobnobbing with Hollywood celebrities - the same M.O. the D's use in every election. And her policies were godawful.
Anonymous
Post 09/26/2017 08:03     Subject: Why hrc was right about white women - and their husbands
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:00:58, 06:38, 07:03, 07:11 are the same troll.


And 07:39, back from trolling other threads.

Any time you disagree with someone, you call them a troll? Maybe they just don't share your liberal views.


Yes, the uneducated of both sexs voted against there own interests for a snake oil salesman. More people still voted for Clinton.

CLINTON TRUMP
White men 31% 63%
White women 43 53
White women college graduates 51 45
White women non-college graduates 34 62
White men college graduates 39 54
White men non-college graduates 23 72
White women without college degrees chose Trump
SOURCE: EDISON RESEARCH EXIT POLLS
Anonymous
Post 09/26/2017 07:59     Subject: Why hrc was right about white women - and their husbands
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:00:58, 06:38, 07:03, 07:11 are the same troll.


And 07:39, back from trolling other threads.

Any time you disagree with someone, you call them a troll? Maybe they just don't share your liberal views.

^^^ Libs don't think a woman can have any of her own views. She's either trolling, or her husband made her do it. For the party of feminists, libs sure have some backward ideas about women.
Anonymous
Post 09/26/2017 07:51     Subject: Why hrc was right about white women - and their husbands
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:00:58, 06:38, 07:03, 07:11 are the same troll.


And 07:39, back from trolling other threads.

Any time you disagree with someone, you call them a troll? Maybe they just don't share your liberal views.
Anonymous
Post 09/26/2017 07:44     Subject: Why hrc was right about white women - and their husbands
Anonymous wrote:00:58, 06:38, 07:03, 07:11 are the same troll.


And 07:39, back from trolling other threads.
Anonymous
Post 09/26/2017 07:44     Subject: Why hrc was right about white women - and their husbands
00:58, 06:38, 07:03, 07:11 are the same troll.
Anonymous
Post 09/26/2017 07:38     Subject: Why hrc was right about white women - and their husbands
Anonymous wrote:I think it's silly to say all women should have voted Clinton just because they are the same gender. If you really want to talk about race, Clinton lost because of low voter turnout among blacks in the Midwest. That's what cost Clinton the election, not white women. Remember she only lost by a few 10's of thousands of votes in those states.

http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/05/12/black-voter-turnout-fell-in-2016-even-as-a-record-number-of-americans-cast-ballots/

That's true. And if a black man were running, these "no-shows" would have turned out in droves. That's racist - judging a presidential candidate (or anyone) by the color of his skin.
Anonymous
Post 09/26/2017 07:33     Subject: Why hrc was right about white women - and their husbands
I think it's silly to say all women should have voted Clinton just because they are the same gender. If you really want to talk about race, Clinton lost because of low voter turnout among blacks in the Midwest. That's what cost Clinton the election, not white women. Remember she only lost by a few 10's of thousands of votes in those states.

http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/05/12/black-voter-turnout-fell-in-2016-even-as-a-record-number-of-americans-cast-ballots/
Anonymous
Post 09/26/2017 07:26     Subject: Re:Why hrc was right about white women - and their husbands
I am a white married woman in her 50's and many of my friends are similar. None of us voted for Trump.