Anonymous wrote:No. I think you're either born gay or straight- either is fine.
Anyone else who flip flops seems to have too much dramatic baggage that I want nothing to do with

How can you be born gay or straight and not bi-sexual? Wouldn't that be a genetic mid point to sexual preference?

Anonymous wrote:No. I think you're either born gay or straight- either is fine.
Anyone else who flip flops seems to have too much dramatic baggage that I want nothing to do with

plus, I think pursuing a bi-sexual lifestyle means the person is way too focused on sexuality and sex, and I prefer people who are intelligent, interesting and focused on things other than themselves.
also, don't bisexuals have a disproportionate amount of sexual diseases?

Never, I don't have a penis and can't compete.
Plus, they are usually messed up in the head and overly sexual.

Anonymous wrote:Before I answer, I want to know why you ask.

I'm not the rabbit guy. I'm a woman, and I met a great guy through friends. I am well aware that he has dated men and women. Mostly women, but a couple men. We get along well, we have fun. There seems to be a connection. He is athletic, very smart, and an all around good person. I am going back and forth on if I want to date him though

No. I think you're either born gay or straight- either is fine.
Anyone else who flip flops seems to have too much dramatic baggage that I want nothing to do with

Before I answer, I want to know why you ask.

Anonymous wrote:Are you the rabbit guy?

+1

It's totally him.

Are you the rabbit guy?

Definitely not.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No.

For all of the "no's" why not?

Cause it's gross.

No, remember Elaine on Seinfeld's discussion. How can we compete with someone who has access to the equipment 24/7?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No.

For all of the "no's" why not?

Because I don't have a penis and bi men know how good the penis is.

No thanks.

Anonymous wrote:For the ladies, would you date a bi sexual man?

And for all of the "yes's" why?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No.

For all of the "no's" why not?

Are you kidding? Isn't it pretty obvious?