Anonymous wrote:I'm changing agencies and have to do a security clearance/background check. On the foreign contacts form, I asked for guidance, and they said list anyone (friend or relative)with whom I had a "close and continuing" relationship in the past seven years. My entire extended family lives in India. I visited them once last May (and before that, maybe five years ago). I keep in touch on Facebook with some cousins. Do I need to include these people? I don't think it is a close and continuing relationship, but I don't need to be the next Jared Kushner.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yeah, clearances are a privilege and should be for Americans without foreign relations
Wrong. Clearances are for those that can be trusted with national secrets. Having foreign relations doesn't preclude someone from being trustworthy.
OP, the "close and continuing" is for friends and people who are not related to you. All family need to be disclosed to the best of your ability.
no. It makes no sense to hire a foreigner with extended family in another country, especially India, to do work with national secrets. There are plenty of US citizens with excellent skills.
this person should go get a job for the Indian government.
Only American Citizens get security clearances. You'd know that if you weren't a racist idiot.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yeah, clearances are a privilege and should be for Americans without foreign relations
Wrong. Clearances are for those that can be trusted with national secrets. Having foreign relations doesn't preclude someone from being trustworthy.
OP, the "close and continuing" is for friends and people who are not related to you. All family need to be disclosed to the best of your ability.
no. It makes no sense to hire a foreigner with extended family in another country, especially India, to do work with national secrets. There are plenty of US citizens with excellent skills.
this person should go get a job for the Indian government.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yeah, clearances are a privilege and should be for Americans without foreign relations
Wrong. Clearances are for those that can be trusted with national secrets. Having foreign relations doesn't preclude someone from being trustworthy.
OP, the "close and continuing" is for friends and people who are not related to you. All family need to be disclosed to the best of your ability.
no. It makes no sense to hire a foreigner with extended family in another country, especially India, to do work with national secrets. There are plenty of US citizens with excellent skills.
this person should go get a job for the Indian government.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yeah, clearances are a privilege and should be for Americans without foreign relations
Wrong. Clearances are for those that can be trusted with national secrets. Having foreign relations doesn't preclude someone from being trustworthy.
OP, the "close and continuing" is for friends and people who are not related to you. All family need to be disclosed to the best of your ability.
no. It makes no sense to hire a foreigner with extended family in another country, especially India, to do work with national secrets. There are plenty of US citizens with excellent skills.
this person should go get a job for the Indian government.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yeah, clearances are a privilege and should be for Americans without foreign relations
Wrong. Clearances are for those that can be trusted with national secrets. Having foreign relations doesn't preclude someone from being trustworthy.
OP, the "close and continuing" is for friends and people who are not related to you. All family need to be disclosed to the best of your ability.
no. It makes no sense to hire a foreigner with extended family in another country, especially India, to do work with national secrets. There are plenty of US citizens with excellent skills.
this person should go get a job for the Indian government.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yeah, clearances are a privilege and should be for Americans without foreign relations
Wrong. Clearances are for those that can be trusted with national secrets. Having foreign relations doesn't preclude someone from being trustworthy.
OP, the "close and continuing" is for friends and people who are not related to you. All family need to be disclosed to the best of your ability.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The fact that you're asking this question honestly scares me.
This makes me think you are either someone who has never applied for a security clearance, or you're a white nationalist. I've been through this process and it was extremely confusing who needed to be listed. In this area of the country, we talk to foreign nationals every single day and it is not clear who needs to be listed. In addition, they want a lot of personal information on these people (like the town they're from in their home country) that it's nearly impossible to know.
OP, list everyone. Your family you saw the last time you visited, your FB cousins, and anyone else. If it takes you an extra week to fill this out, then take the extra week. You cannot list too many people here.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The fact that you're asking this question honestly scares me.
Why is that?
You don't have a basic understanding of protocols for dealing with foreign nationals. Your naïveté will risk safety of nation. Are you working on AWS DOD Cloud?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The fact that you're asking this question honestly scares me.
Why is that?
You don't have a basic understanding of protocols for dealing with foreign nationals. Your naïveté will risk safety of nation. Are you working on AWS DOD Cloud?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The fact that you're asking this question honestly scares me.
Why is that?
You don't have a basic understanding of protocols for dealing with foreign nationals. Your naïveté will risk safety of nation. Are you working on AWS DOD Cloud?