Anonymous wrote:Adultery is only your...the parent's concern. It doesn't affect his ability to maintain the home that they've always lived in...since it seems his keeping it. Why didn't you keep the home?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Except that sometimes the cheating spouse is the least to blame. Some sins are visible, and a lot are not.
+1
Anonymous wrote:OP saisds affairS plural, not an affair single.
Anonymous wrote:I think it sucks. My ex DH broke up our family with his affairs and because I could only find a home that I could afford outside the school district (but still very close by) and because he has parents living with him to help with child care, I stand a small chance of losing physical custody of my children because it could be viewed that uprooting them from that district and their home and the care they get as not "in their best interest". Plus, because of that, I'll have to pay child support. How is that fair??? He broke this family up!!! Adultery should absolutely be factored in to chains custody arrangements but it isn't. Does anyone know why and can convince me of the fairness of this?
Anonymous wrote:
Except that sometimes the cheating spouse is the least to blame. Some sins are visible, and a lot are not.
Anonymous wrote:He cheated for a reason, its never black and white
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, you are a woman, so it is highly unlikely that you won't get at least shared custody. Child custody is biased against men, but it seems to be getting better due to these old goat judges retiring. His ability to be a good spouse isn't relevant to his ability to be a good parent.
But often it is. Men who have affairs often check out of the family and have a do-over with a younger woman. It is literally never in the best interests of the child for the dad to start a second family and dilute his time and money.
Anonymous wrote:I think it sucks. My ex DH broke up our family with his affairs and because I could only find a home that I could afford outside the school district (but still very close by) and because he has parents living with him to help with child care, I stand a small chance of losing physical custody of my children because it could be viewed that uprooting them from that district and their home and the care they get as not "in their best interest". Plus, because of that, I'll have to pay child support. How is that fair??? He broke this family up!!! Adultery should absolutely be factored in to chains custody arrangements but it isn't. Does anyone know why and can convince me of the fairness of this?
Anonymous wrote:OP, you are a woman, so it is highly unlikely that you won't get at least shared custody. Child custody is biased against men, but it seems to be getting better due to these old goat judges retiring. His ability to be a good spouse isn't relevant to his ability to be a good parent.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Except that sometimes the cheating spouse is the least to blame. Some sins are visible, and a lot are not.
Actually I agree with other PPs: the children's best practical interests are considered, not which spouse wronged which (and in that case, see above - sometimes it's not obvious).
The cheating spouse is almost never the least to blame.
You might tell yourself that to excuse your infidelity, but that is just another lie to beneifit yourself.