Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I thought Miller was eloquent and right on target, refuting Acosta and Thrush all along the way with their "petty" and "narrow" questions and continued interruptions.

Mrs. Miller, I hardly think you are in a position of impartial evaluation of Stephen's performance, but I am sure his boss was super happy with it.

Bolded is true. Miller was speaking the absolute truth when he said at the end, "I think that was exactly what we were hoping would happen."

Anonymous wrote:Miller should not be talking with the press--but, if Acosta keeps up the grandstanding, then cameras should go dark again.

By way of background, the policy office usually puts out a document with statistics etc that explain the policy they are to present at the briefing. That didn't happen here, so Mr. Acosta was asking for information that the media and public usually get on background. If that is grandstanding in your mind, then you simply don't understand how the White House or media are supposed to work.

Anonymous wrote:I thought Miller was eloquent and right on target, refuting Acosta and Thrush all along the way with their "petty" and "narrow" questions and continued interruptions.

Mrs. Miller, I hardly think you are in a position of impartial evaluation of Stephen's performance, but I am sure his boss was super happy with it.

Anonymous wrote:Miller should not be talking with the press--but, if Acosta keeps up the grandstanding, then cameras should go dark again.

You know democracy is dying when asking a question is considered grandstanding and cause for someone to suggest everyone should be kept in the dark.

Miller should not be talking with the press--but, if Acosta keeps up the grandstanding, then cameras should go dark again.

Anonymous wrote:can someone pls summarize for those of us who didn't see it??????

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-J4FvxtD9I

Jim, you ignorant slut!

How is that dude only 31?

can someone pls summarize for those of us who didn't see it??????

Anonymous wrote:I thought Miller was eloquent and right on target, refuting Acosta and Thrush all along the way with their "petty" and "narrow" questions and continued interruptions.

Only Steven Miller himself could think that.

Hi Steve. Been midnight tokin' again?

Anonymous wrote:I thought Miller was eloquent and right on target, refuting Acosta and Thrush all along the way with their "petty" and "narrow" questions and continued interruptions.

Why are petty and narrow on quotes? Do you mean something else? Perhaps YOU need to learn the English language better.

Anonymous wrote:I thought Miller was eloquent and right on target, refuting Acosta and Thrush all along the way with their "petty" and "narrow" questions and continued interruptions.

You are high or mentally impaired

Anonymous wrote:I thought Miller was eloquent and right on target, refuting Acosta and Thrush all along the way with their "petty" and "narrow" questions and continued interruptions.

What? You need to watch that again. He came off as an arrogant, uninformed, ideaological fool.

I thought Miller was eloquent and right on target, refuting Acosta and Thrush all along the way with their "petty" and "narrow" questions and continued interruptions.

He's an ahole.