Anonymous wrote:If the pip was specifically created do your colleague, HR will know they've violated that persons confidentiality. They will be worried that you and the colleague will get together and compare notes (and, worse case, file some type of complaint,etc). You have more power/leverage if they know that you know of their blunder.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you are in the federal government, failing a PIP leads to either your termination or demotion.
Right now, sit down and in writing respond to the PIP and state:
1. The PIP does not contain your name.
2. The PIP is not individualized to your situation. Do not state that you know an identical PIP was given to your colleague. State that the PIP does not reflect your individual situation and does not appear to be created with you in mind. Leave it at those words.
3. Address the errors and vagueness. You don't have to write at length. Simply state "At page 4, I don't know what "unique work product" means and I will need a definition. "At page 5 you refer to widgets and I don't work on widgets."
+1
Anonymous wrote:I have seen PIPs referenced several times on this forum. What does it stand for?