Anonymous wrote:I can't take this thread seriously considering the millions of dollars it took to pay for security for Melania to not live in the White House for so many months and for the security detail so trump could hang out at mar a largo. Not to mention security for Jared and Ivanka. You rubes really are idiots if you aren't outraged about that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You sound like a silly servant. Why would we need 110 staffers to vet tweets, when one will do?
I'd rather he hire one person to vet his tweets than save $5m.
Most Americans feel the same.
I might as well wish for a unicorn, because Trump isn't going to stop his unpresidential tweeting.
Unclench your pearls and anal orifice
Howzabout you jerks stop trying to build an army of bureaucrats, committees, commissions and professional paper pushers in DC?
Anonymous wrote:You sound like a silly servant. Why would we need 110 staffers to vet tweets, when one will do?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wish he would hire 110 more staffers who would vet his tweets before he sent them. That would definitely be $5m well spent.
You put social media crap over well kept military cemeteries? Not surprising at all.
Liberals, you are a peace of work.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wish he would hire 110 more staffers who would vet his tweets before he sent them. That would definitely be $5m well spent.
You put social media crap over well kept military cemeteries? Not surprising at all.
Liberals, you are a peace of work.
It's a question of return on investment, really. One quarter of the president's annual salary to the Department of the Interior won't go very far to fix military cemeteries. But 110 staffers -- or however many it takes -- might do a lot to restore at least a veneer of presidential-ness to Trump's social media presence.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wish he would hire 110 more staffers who would vet his tweets before he sent them. That would definitely be $5m well spent.
You put social media crap over well kept military cemeteries? Not surprising at all.
Liberals, you are a peace of work.
It's a question of return on investment, really. One quarter of the president's annual salary to the Department of the Interior won't go very far to fix military cemeteries. But 110 staffers -- or however many it takes -- might do a lot to restore at least a veneer of presidential-ness to Trump's social media presence.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wish he would hire 110 more staffers who would vet his tweets before he sent them. That would definitely be $5m well spent.
You put social media crap over well kept military cemeteries? Not surprising at all.
Liberals, you are a peace of work.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wish he would hire 110 more staffers who would vet his tweets before he sent them. That would definitely be $5m well spent.
You put social media crap over well kept military cemeteries? Not surprising at all.
Liberals, you are a peace of work.
Anonymous wrote:I wish he would hire 110 more staffers who would vet his tweets before he sent them. That would definitely be $5m well spent.
Anonymous wrote:bfd. The amount he will make from his conflicts of interests dwarfs his potus pay.
Anonymous wrote:Maybe he could also pay his fair share of taxes to help the veterans.