Anonymous wrote:The author doesn't define what he means by "overweight" and "skinny" which complicates things. Are we talking about BMI chart overweight, which could be size 8-12 or are we talking about morbidly obese? I think there's a difference.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Being in bed with a bag of bones in not sexy, men like soft women, with fat in the right places. It's biological.
Also, thin women look older and that is less sexually attractive to men on a biological level.
either you get it EVERYWHERE or you get none. can't be selective on "where"
I'll take it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Being in bed with a bag of bones in not sexy, men like soft women, with fat in the right places. It's biological.
Also, thin women look older and that is less sexually attractive to men on a biological level.
either you get it EVERYWHERE or you get none. can't be selective on "where"
Anonymous wrote:The fat preference is based on porn searches on Google and can hardly be extrapolated to the whole population.
Isn't this called a self-selecting sample?
The guy who did this study also says he thinks women are obsessed with whether their husbands are gay, b/c they ask Google that.
Again, how many women never even ask Google a single question about their husbands-- his sexuality or otherwise?
Bunch of click-bait BS
Anonymous wrote:Being in bed with a bag of bones in not sexy, men like soft women, with fat in the right places. It's biological.
Also, thin women look older and that is less sexually attractive to men on a biological level.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I spend a lot of time with guys. So much so that they tend to forget I'm not one of them. I hear them talk about women all day long. I have never heard any of them refer to an overweight woman as attractive. Sorry.
The point is they don't admit it.