Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:But even if 300 people from the school applied to,say, Harvard, if only a few have gotten in over the years, those points on the scattergram are still pretty identifiable. And I would be surprised if any school didn't show a scattergram for Harvard.
Ours showed it for Harvard. Since it's 5 year data I don't think people are necessarily identifiable. There were 2-5 admits a year so over 5 years that's about 15 data points.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Our school's scattergrams are in the "new" format, which is intended to show whether each data point was an early decision or a regular decision, but the chart identifies everyone as being RD (seems highly unlikely at HYPS). Has anyone else come across this?
Yes, I noticed the same thing, that everyone is RD. Not sure if it's a mistake or they just posted only RDs.
Anonymous wrote:Our school's scattergrams are in the "new" format, which is intended to show whether each data point was an early decision or a regular decision, but the chart identifies everyone as being RD (seems highly unlikely at HYPS). Has anyone else come across this?
Anonymous wrote:But even if 300 people from the school applied to,say, Harvard, if only a few have gotten in over the years, those points on the scattergram are still pretty identifiable. And I would be surprised if any school didn't show a scattergram for Harvard.