Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just a reminder that the many teachers who ARE finishing the year, who would like to have a dependable long-term career in DCPS, are still waiting for a new contract and retroactive pay. This becomes an issue of professionalism and respect. Many valued colleagues are not returning to our school in the fall.
LEAP and IMPACT are another big reason folks are leaving this year. It's a lose lose situation in most, but not all, schools! The money from Rhee's fund has dried up so now they can only afford "a few" people to be effective. Back in the day, you know when they had the cheating scandals and Rhee was in charge, they were splashing the cash!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maybe the experiment with hiring these Ivy Teach for America types should be declared over. They will just leave anyway, and go off to work for a nonprofit or quit when they marry a banker. What's so great about "gentrifying" DCPS teachers anyway? It used to be that DCPS staff were of D.C. They were from the D.C community and they understood D.C. And they were happy to have a career and lifetime career with DCPS.
You mean back when pretty much every school and student was failing? And graduation rates were abysmal?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maybe the experiment with hiring these Ivy Teach for America types should be declared over. They will just leave anyway, and go off to work for a nonprofit or quit when they marry a banker. What's so great about "gentrifying" DCPS teachers anyway? It used to be that DCPS staff were of D.C. They were from the D.C community and they understood D.C. And they were happy to have a career and lifetime career with DCPS.
You mean back when pretty much every school and student was failing? And graduation rates were abysmal?
No! thats so unfair. D.C. was different than it is not. The generation that were kids are now adults with kids. We all know that you need "Experienced teachers" in the lower performing schools. Think of it like this "Rookie doctors are not doing major life and death surgeries from day 1" This teach for america is though do this all the time Yet, we wonder why some school struggle DCPS and charters included. Teach for america is not bad. However, put the rookie teachers in good schools so when they have to go to low petforming schools they have a chance
Or send them to Oklahoma were they need teachers, there is not a teacher shortage in DC we are the highest paying district so we should not be hiring TFA. Rookie trained qualified teachers yet, because everyone has to start somewhere but need to support them and most importantly keep the good teachers we have and not try and drive them away.
Anonymous wrote:Just a reminder that the many teachers who ARE finishing the year, who would like to have a dependable long-term career in DCPS, are still waiting for a new contract and retroactive pay. This becomes an issue of professionalism and respect. Many valued colleagues are not returning to our school in the fall.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maybe the experiment with hiring these Ivy Teach for America types should be declared over. They will just leave anyway, and go off to work for a nonprofit or quit when they marry a banker. What's so great about "gentrifying" DCPS teachers anyway? It used to be that DCPS staff were of D.C. They were from the D.C community and they understood D.C. And they were happy to have a career and lifetime career with DCPS.
You mean back when pretty much every school and student was failing? And graduation rates were abysmal?
No! thats so unfair. D.C. was different than it is not. The generation that were kids are now adults with kids. We all know that you need "Experienced teachers" in the lower performing schools. Think of it like this "Rookie doctors are not doing major life and death surgeries from day 1" This teach for america is though do this all the time Yet, we wonder why some school struggle DCPS and charters included. Teach for america is not bad. However, put the rookie teachers in good schools so when they have to go to low petforming schools they have a chance
Anonymous wrote:Just a reminder that the many teachers who ARE finishing the year, who would like to have a dependable long-term career in DCPS, are still waiting for a new contract and retroactive pay. This becomes an issue of professionalism and respect. Many valued colleagues are not returning to our school in the fall.
Anonymous wrote:Also, DCPS is so desperate that they are now advertising on Facebook for a new alternative certification program where people with teaching experience but no certifications can teach in their schools. Basically scraping the bottom of the barrel for subs and people who probably couldn't pass the Praxis on their own. This should be interesting. This is different from TFA and fellows programs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maybe the experiment with hiring these Ivy Teach for America types should be declared over. They will just leave anyway, and go off to work for a nonprofit or quit when they marry a banker. What's so great about "gentrifying" DCPS teachers anyway? It used to be that DCPS staff were of D.C. They were from the D.C community and they understood D.C. And they were happy to have a career and lifetime career with DCPS.
You mean back when pretty much every school and student was failing? And graduation rates were abysmal?
No! thats so unfair. D.C. was different than it is not. The generation that were kids are now adults with kids. We all know that you need "Experienced teachers" in the lower performing schools. Think of it like this "Rookie doctors are not doing major life and death surgeries from day 1" This teach for america is though do this all the time Yet, we wonder why some school struggle DCPS and charters included. Teach for america is not bad. However, put the rookie teachers in good schools so when they have to go to low petforming schools they have a chance
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maybe the experiment with hiring these Ivy Teach for America types should be declared over. They will just leave anyway, and go off to work for a nonprofit or quit when they marry a banker. What's so great about "gentrifying" DCPS teachers anyway? It used to be that DCPS staff were of D.C. They were from the D.C community and they understood D.C. And they were happy to have a career and lifetime career with DCPS.
You mean back when pretty much every school and student was failing? And graduation rates were abysmal?
Anonymous wrote:The teacher evaluation system can be arbitrary and is oppressive in the amount of extra paperwork that teachers need to do.
Principals now do the evaluations and teachers feel that depending on your relationship with the principal, scores are not objective, consistent or take into account a teacher's overall performance in the building.
As an anecdote-and there are many similar stories all over dcps...At my school, the principal seemed to dislike a teacher (who had been at the school for over 10 years, loved by colleagues, parents and students), within two years, that teacher was "Impacted Out". Everyone was shocked. It was all based on the Impact score which came down to decimals, which was given by the principal. When your livelihood seems to be at the whim of a principal (who has varied approval ratings from staff and parents), it's understandable that teachers may want a more objective, fair work environment.
And, it all takes away from teachers focusing on teaching-which is what teachers want to do.
Yes, dcps pays well compared to other districts but teachers are finding out that all the hoops to jump through may not be worth it.