Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Well, I certainly hope the surgeon who is doing my surgery next month doesn't subscribe to this philosophy.
Really? If there is a complication - which DOES, of course, happen - you want your surgeon to just get a bad review and then move on to the next surgery? Or would you rather he fix his errors and keep working until he has mastered the issue?
Anonymous wrote:
Well, I certainly hope the surgeon who is doing my surgery next month doesn't subscribe to this philosophy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I on the other hand hope his med school let him keep trying till he had it right rather than just moving on to new concepts.
Yeah, but med school is not the real world. It is med school. The surgeon has one chance to get it right. We should all be going into any important project with this attitude rather than thinking we will do it all over again if it is not good enough. But you public school parents go ahead and keep justifying the dumbing down of your children. I feel sorry for you!
Anonymous wrote:I on the other hand hope his med school let him keep trying till he had it right rather than just moving on to new concepts.
Anonymous wrote:I think your stance on this really comes down to what you think the purpose of school and testing is.
If you think school is designed to teach children material, and tests are designed to ascertain whether they have learned such material, then retakes make perfect sense. They show the child has learned the material.
If you think that schools are designed to identify and reward the "smartest" kids and tests are designed to rank children, then retakes are akin to cheating.
In any case, I've never understood the comparison to the work world. I absolutely revise and redo work at work. I'll complete preparation for a presentation, and then sleep on it and revise it the next day. Should I be punished because it wasn't perfect the first time? Additionally, we have extensive peer reviews before major products are distributed or presentations are given. We are far more focused on getting the best product at completion than judging each other on their first draft.
It's school with the "here's your one and only shot at learning something" that isn't the "real world"
Anonymous wrote:I think your stance on this really comes down to what you think the purpose of school and testing is.
If you think school is designed to teach children material, and tests are designed to ascertain whether they have learned such material, then retakes make perfect sense. They show the child has learned the material.
If you think that schools are designed to identify and reward the "smartest" kids and tests are designed to rank children, then retakes are akin to cheating.
In any case, I've never understood the comparison to the work world. I absolutely revise and redo work at work. I'll complete preparation for a presentation, and then sleep on it and revise it the next day. Should I be punished because it wasn't perfect the first time? Additionally, we have extensive peer reviews before major products are distributed or presentations are given. We are far more focused on getting the best product at completion than judging each other on their first draft.
It's school with the "here's your one and only shot at learning something" that isn't the "real world"
Anonymous wrote:It's not enabling. Enlightened teachers and school districts allow this. If you are an educator and at all up on modern educational theory, you'll know that the focus is enabling a kid to learn material, even if it takes multiple tries.
Anonymous wrote:Who said any thing about third retakes. Most classes offer one retake of a quiz per quarter. I know a kid in Arlington who got extra credit for bringing tissue boxes in the class!
Anonymous wrote:Who said any thing about third retakes. Most classes offer one retake of a quiz per quarter. I know a kid in Arlington who got extra credit for bringing tissue boxes in the class!
Anonymous wrote:To me it is far better than allowing random extra credit to bring up a grade..