Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He knew you were being laid off and didn't want a pregnancy-related lawsuit. Seems you've never been a great employee so they don't want to invest in you.
+1
Did you read OP's post? She says she got her first negative review only after her first pregnancy. Before that, all reviews were good.
OP said they received "average" performance reviews. To me that means "satisfactory" or something similar. Many (if not most) places "satisfactory" means "shitty."
As a fed if I started to get "meets expectations" as opposed to "exceeds expectations" or "outstanding" I'd start getting my shit together because if I ever wanted to change jobs every employer in the world knows that "meets expectations" in the fed world means "I can't fire the guy, but I sure as shit wouldn't keep him around if I had a choice."
Uhh many of the places I've worked "meets expectations" is pretty good and 90 percent of the people get that.
Anonymous wrote:File for unemployment. Get it all in writing. My boss threatened me if I came back that she's make things very difficult. She was very angry I took leave. She documented it all. She lied to unemployment but after they saw the emails they agreed I should not have gone back and I got unemployment. Nice folks.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He knew you were being laid off and didn't want a pregnancy-related lawsuit. Seems you've never been a great employee so they don't want to invest in you.
+1
Did you read OP's post? She says she got her first negative review only after her first pregnancy. Before that, all reviews were good.
OP said they received "average" performance reviews. To me that means "satisfactory" or something similar. Many (if not most) places "satisfactory" means "shitty."
As a fed if I started to get "meets expectations" as opposed to "exceeds expectations" or "outstanding" I'd start getting my shit together because if I ever wanted to change jobs every employer in the world knows that "meets expectations" in the fed world means "I can't fire the guy, but I sure as shit wouldn't keep him around if I had a choice."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He knew you were being laid off and didn't want a pregnancy-related lawsuit. Seems you've never been a great employee so they don't want to invest in you.
+1
Did you read OP's post? She says she got her first negative review only after her first pregnancy. Before that, all reviews were good.
She said that reviews were average before. In my company, average is below good and excellent.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He knew you were being laid off and didn't want a pregnancy-related lawsuit. Seems you've never been a great employee so they don't want to invest in you.
+1
Did you read OP's post? She says she got her first negative review only after her first pregnancy. Before that, all reviews were good.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He knew you were being laid off and didn't want a pregnancy-related lawsuit. Seems you've never been a great employee so they don't want to invest in you.
+1
Did you read OP's post? She says she got her first negative review only after her first pregnancy. Before that, all reviews were good.
Anonymous wrote:He knew you were being laid off and didn't want a pregnancy-related lawsuit. Seems you've never been a great employee so they don't want to invest in you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He knew you were being laid off and didn't want a pregnancy-related lawsuit. Seems you've never been a great employee so they don't want to invest in you.
+1