Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In the schools that were part of the pilot program, parents were only given the overall median percentile for students tested at their school and their own child's overall percentile among those tested nationally.
It really does seem as though they are testing out a shift from a program for the "highly gifted" to one for kids who are regarded as strong students.
I've had two kids in the HGC, and that's what it mostly was already, in my opinion. There were some kids there who were "highly gifted" (from what I could tell), but I don't think that my kids are. They're just smart kids.
Anonymous wrote:In the schools that were part of the pilot program, parents were only given the overall median percentile for students tested at their school and their own child's overall percentile among those tested nationally.
It really does seem as though they are testing out a shift from a program for the "highly gifted" to one for kids who are regarded as strong students.
Anonymous wrote:In the schools that were part of the pilot program, parents were only given the overall median percentile for students tested at their school and their own child's overall percentile among those tested nationally.
It really does seem as though they are testing out a shift from a program for the "highly gifted" to one for kids who are regarded as strong students.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My DC remains in the wait pool. The letter does reveal the median SAS score of the selected students in the Center. My son's score is exactly the same as the median score... However, " the score is not determinative of selection and is one of the multiple factors reviewed".
I know a kid whose SAS score is much higher than median score got successful appeal and now is accepted in HGC.
My kids'S score was higher than the median and he was rejected. On appeal, we learned his teacher's recommendation sank his application. She had told us during a p/t conference that she "didn't believe" in gifted education.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My DC remains in the wait pool. The letter does reveal the median SAS score of the selected students in the Center. My son's score is exactly the same as the median score... However, " the score is not determinative of selection and is one of the multiple factors reviewed".
I know a kid whose SAS score is much higher than median score got successful appeal and now is accepted in HGC.
My kids'S score was higher than the median and he was rejected. On appeal, we learned his teacher's recommendation sank his application. She had told us during a p/t conference that she "didn't believe" in gifted education.
Anonymous wrote:My DC remains in the wait pool. The letter does reveal the median SAS score of the selected students in the Center. My son's score is exactly the same as the median score... However, " the score is not determinative of selection and is one of the multiple factors reviewed".
I know a kid whose SAS score is much higher than median score got successful appeal and now is accepted in HGC.
Anonymous wrote:Seems like they are moving towards a pullout in every school..that is what the pilot is. No bus ride required but a scaled down program.
Anonymous wrote:
Yes... hence the change in the entrance criteria.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
They are disruptive.
They aren't receptive to different learning styles
They are too shy and don't advocate for themselves
They don't do well in new situations
They have issues working together with peers
It's not intended to be the Center for Highly Well-Behaved, Adaptable, Outgoing, Collaborative Children. And in my children's experience, it isn't.
+1. Yes.
HIGHLY GIFTED Center.
Otherwise change the name and mission.
Didn't they actually just change the name to Centers for Enriched Studies (?)
Yes... hence the change in the entrance criteria.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My DC remains in the wait pool. The letter does reveal the median SAS score of the selected students in the Center. My son's score is exactly the same as the median score... However, " the score is not determinative of selection and is one of the multiple factors reviewed".
I know a kid whose SAS score is much higher than median score got successful appeal and now is accepted in HGC.
It makes you wonder why they did not accept this child to begin with.
Because the median score is not a minimum.
I cannot see a reason to exclude a child whose score is much higher than the median score.
Really? You think ONE score defines who should get in HGC. The majority is the teacher's recommendation, not the score.
They are disruptive.
They aren't receptive to different learning styles
They are too shy and don't advocate for themselves
They don't do well in new situations
They have issues working together with peers
There are a ton of reasons kids aren't picked and the entire appeals process is a joke and a waste of time and money of our school budget spent paying people to go thru the appeals process. Actually the entire HGC program is a joke. Parents fighting for a few places in a subpar curriculum that they basically just want to either get their kid out of their homeschool, put them with kids that like learning, or to brag to other parents about. It costs millions each year to do this program and bus them around. MCPS needs to follow other local counties and do more in house to kids that are gifted. Not allow parents to play and appeal the program.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
They are disruptive.
They aren't receptive to different learning styles
They are too shy and don't advocate for themselves
They don't do well in new situations
They have issues working together with peers
It's not intended to be the Center for Highly Well-Behaved, Adaptable, Outgoing, Collaborative Children. And in my children's experience, it isn't.
+1. Yes.
HIGHLY GIFTED Center.
Otherwise change the name and mission.
Didn't they actually just change the name to Centers for Enriched Studies (?)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
They are disruptive.
They aren't receptive to different learning styles
They are too shy and don't advocate for themselves
They don't do well in new situations
They have issues working together with peers
It's not intended to be the Center for Highly Well-Behaved, Adaptable, Outgoing, Collaborative Children. And in my children's experience, it isn't.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
They are disruptive.
They aren't receptive to different learning styles
They are too shy and don't advocate for themselves
They don't do well in new situations
They have issues working together with peers
It's not intended to be the Center for Highly Well-Behaved, Adaptable, Outgoing, Collaborative Children. And in my children's experience, it isn't.
+1. Yes.
HIGHLY GIFTED Center.
Otherwise change the name and mission.