Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:See I think it was always a dark story. It was the story of an abused and neglected orphan who struggled to fit in and a pair of elderly siblings who had set aside all hope of anything but a hard grind through their retirement years finding happiness because they realized that connecting and loving one another helped them overcome their dark past. I think there is added depth when you realize what a contrast there is between the before and the after for all of the characters.
I disagree. In the original stories and adaptation, the characters each had struggles and pain but they were still happy and loving people. This new adaptation removes any and all joy from the story and makes everyone and everything awful.
Anonymous wrote:I'm a huge fan of the the books, and find the new series too dark. In the books Anne is able to find joy in little things despite the harshness of life. Her little side stories and voices she hears in the books are shown as innocent imaginary friends, in this new series they are shown as delusions. Marilla keeps her home from the church picnic for "stealing" the pin in the book, in the show they send her back to the orphanage! Why did they make Gilbert an orphan? It's all too much.
The theme song is a Ahead by a Century by the Tragically Hip (Iconic Canadian band, not well-known at all outside Canada as far as I can tell).
Anonymous wrote:She grew up to be pretty, but the first book consistently describes her as scrawny, skinny, freckled, etc and she gets picked on for her looks.
Anonymous wrote:But seriously, Matthew should not have a love interest!
One thing I will give it is that the actress looks more convincing as an awkward, skinny, and plain orphan than Megan Follows did. She embodied Anne's spirit much better, but she was always obviously pretty, even as a child.
Anonymous wrote:The opening theme song is SO horrible. What was going through their mind? The visuals are beautiful but then they have this annoying soft-rock song? Why not a rap song or techno? It would be just as inappropriate.
To me, Amybeth has a very stilted delivery, just kind of out the lines with a little laugh in almost every line as an indicator that she is "being passionate.' She becomes more natural as the episodes progress, but she comes across as inauthentic. Just a kid actor delivering lines. Her whole delivery is so flat.
Jerry is also another bad child actor on this show who gets too much airtime.
The actress in the 1985 version was just so perfect. Anne was fiery, emotional, in love with language and storytelling. So believable to me.
The strong points of this show are watching Marilla, Rachel Lynde, and Diana. So, so good. Love their portrayal of those characters. The cinematography is absolutely gorgeous.
Also, Matthew is totally hot. Yum.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My read is that there are many, many versions of this for the kids. This is a version for grown-ups. The 1980's version is for people who identify with Diana--the plucky orphan is a breath of fresh air! This one is for people who identify with Marilla.
You can go with this, sure. And then you can see how many disappointed moms there are who wanted to share this story with their kids 8+. That age, or younger, would have been the expected age. When it was announced, that's what many of my friends thought.