Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:function of the economic times. people see how hard it is to crack into or stay in the umc and a ivy degree really helps on that quest.
ivy madness would not occur in a more economically equal society
It's how the white privileged UMC folk perpetuate themselves. They know that inequality is going to spell big time changes soon, but they can't let go of being on "top."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:function of the economic times. people see how hard it is to crack into or stay in the umc and a ivy degree really helps on that quest.
ivy madness would not occur in a more economically equal society
Totally agree with you. Our society is going from a bell curve to a barbell. It's the end of the middle class.
No, more like a one tail distribution.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:function of the economic times. people see how hard it is to crack into or stay in the umc and a ivy degree really helps on that quest.
ivy madness would not occur in a more economically equal society
It's how the white privileged UMC folk perpetuate themselves. They know that inequality is going to spell big time changes soon, but they can't let go of being on "top."
Anonymous wrote:I wonder what the percentage is of actual qualified students? Is everyone, even those with a mediocre GPA/SAT applying just for the long shot? i.e. it is an UMC hail mary at this point?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:function of the economic times. people see how hard it is to crack into or stay in the umc and a ivy degree really helps on that quest.
ivy madness would not occur in a more economically equal society
Totally agree with you. Our society is going from a bell curve to a barbell. It's the end of the middle class.
Anonymous wrote:function of the economic times. people see how hard it is to crack into or stay in the umc and a ivy degree really helps on that quest.
ivy madness would not occur in a more economically equal society
.]Anonymous wrote:
Half those classes are made up of people who applied ED or SCEA. So it's really not as impressive as schools that have high yields without any binding admissions.
A 61% yield puts Dartmouth as one of the highest, if not second highest, for yields among schools that offers ED. The highest is usually U'Penn. Also, Dartmouth only filled ~43% of its class with ED, compared to 50%+ at most other peers.
An 84% yield without any binding process will probably be the highest in the nation.
They are impressive yields, for sure. Not sure what examples you have which do better? Stanford's yield is comparable to Harvard and its early process is restrictive. MIT's yield is quite impressive but not as high as Harvard's. U'Chicago has gamed its yield with no less than 3 early processes.
I guess I was saying that I was not impressed, but I wasn't comparing them to any particular schools. Then when I was looking online, I found out that University of Nebraska has over a 60% yield. Obviously it's a less impressive school by DCUM standards, but I'm personally more impressed by it's yield. I would compare RD yield at ED/SCEA schools to other schools overall yields. This would put Dartmouth at 40-something percent, which while good, is not in a league of it's own
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:function of the economic times. people see how hard it is to crack into or stay in the umc and a ivy degree really helps on that quest.
ivy madness would not occur in a more economically equal society
It's how the white privileged UMC folk perpetuate themselves. They know that inequality is going to spell big time changes soon, but they can't let go of being on "top."
Anonymous wrote:function of the economic times. people see how hard it is to crack into or stay in the umc and a ivy degree really helps on that quest.
ivy madness would not occur in a more economically equal society