Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I always have short nails because of children and computers but I like them. They look cool. I think your use of the word "ghetto" is unfair as I have seen many women wearing them. They are super popular out West.
Is trashy more fair then?
Anonymous wrote:I always have short nails because of children and computers but I like them. They look cool. I think your use of the word "ghetto" is unfair as I have seen many women wearing them. They are super popular out West.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think the women who have long, fake nails should cut them, then throw on some capri pants and orthopedic sandals so that DCUMers will finally approve of their sense of style.
This x 1000. Maybe throw in a sensible haircut & some LuluRoe, too.
Anonymous wrote:Very long nails deserve a bad rap, because contrary to other beauty trends, it's extremely unhygienic.
1+.
A google search for acrylic nails fungus should illustrate this quickly:
https://www.google.com/search?q=acrylic+nails+fungus&rlz=1T4GUEA_enUS598US598&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiCqazdndHTAhWMTCYKHW_YDRAQsAQIRA&biw=1292&bih=800#spf=1
Shiver.
Anonymous wrote:I think the women who have long, fake nails should cut them, then throw on some capri pants and orthopedic sandals so that DCUMers will finally approve of their sense of style.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't understand the time and money women spend to make their nails look like freaky claws. Long nails with jewels and sparkles and designs. Do people think those freaky, ghetto nails are pretty? Explain it please because I don't get it.
Do you really need it explained that different people find different things aesthetically pleasing? And that what you find aesthetically pleasing is heavily influenced by a variety of cultural factors?
You're not very bright, OP. Elaborate nails aren't my cultural jam. Neither are lotus points, stretched earlobes, or Vineyard Vines. But I'm not dumb enough to think that my cultural niche is universal
Are you really so stupid that you don't get that OP is just kvetching about something she/he finds incredibly ugly. I get that you are trying to be all flowery and inclusive, but you just sound pompous.
cultural niche....ha ha ha ha.
I agree, OP, that those nails are incredibly ugly.
Or maybe the PP isn't trying to be pompous or inclusive, she's just being realistic? You sound oddly defensive- what about PP saying cultural niche sets you off into manic typed laughter? I don't like the look of the aforementioned Vineyard Vines gear or the talon-like nails, but I don't feel the need to have people explain the appeal to me, either. It's simple- different people like different things, and it's often clustered by subculture.
She is overstating the obvious to make herself feel important and inclusive.
My point is simply that OP is saying, "hey, I think those are ugly". Big whoop. You can agree or not but PPs lecture is just laughable.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't understand the time and money women spend to make their nails look like freaky claws. Long nails with jewels and sparkles and designs. Do people think those freaky, ghetto nails are pretty? Explain it please because I don't get it.
Do you really need it explained that different people find different things aesthetically pleasing? And that what you find aesthetically pleasing is heavily influenced by a variety of cultural factors?
You're not very bright, OP. Elaborate nails aren't my cultural jam. Neither are lotus points, stretched earlobes, or Vineyard Vines. But I'm not dumb enough to think that my cultural niche is universal
Are you really so stupid that you don't get that OP is just kvetching about something she/he finds incredibly ugly. I get that you are trying to be all flowery and inclusive, but you just sound pompous.
cultural niche....ha ha ha ha.
I agree, OP, that those nails are incredibly ugly.
Or maybe the PP isn't trying to be pompous or inclusive, she's just being realistic? You sound oddly defensive- what about PP saying cultural niche sets you off into manic typed laughter? I don't like the look of the aforementioned Vineyard Vines gear or the talon-like nails, but I don't feel the need to have people explain the appeal to me, either. It's simple- different people like different things, and it's often clustered by subculture.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't understand the time and money women spend to make their nails look like freaky claws. Long nails with jewels and sparkles and designs. Do people think those freaky, ghetto nails are pretty? Explain it please because I don't get it.
Do you really need it explained that different people find different things aesthetically pleasing? And that what you find aesthetically pleasing is heavily influenced by a variety of cultural factors?
You're not very bright, OP. Elaborate nails aren't my cultural jam. Neither are lotus points, stretched earlobes, or Vineyard Vines. But I'm not dumb enough to think that my cultural niche is universal
Are you really so stupid that you don't get that OP is just kvetching about something she/he finds incredibly ugly. I get that you are trying to be all flowery and inclusive, but you just sound pompous.
cultural niche....ha ha ha ha.
I agree, OP, that those nails are incredibly ugly.
Or maybe the PP isn't trying to be pompous or inclusive, she's just being realistic? You sound oddly defensive- what about PP saying cultural niche sets you off into manic typed laughter? I don't like the look of the aforementioned Vineyard Vines gear or the talon-like nails, but I don't feel the need to have people explain the appeal to me, either. It's simple- different people like different things, and it's often clustered by subculture.
Anonymous wrote:I feel the same way about the grandmas here who insist everyone should wear pantyhose. So ugly and old.