Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NO.
I work with lots of H-1Bs. Very nice people, some very smart but the ability to read, speak, write, and understand English is never as good as a person raised in the US even if that person was the lowest performer in college. Your child is far better off with that person than the the H-1B as a teacher.
So the worst qualified native English speaker would be a far better teacher than the best qualified foreigner just because their English skills are better? That's a ridiculous statement, particularly in science and math.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NO.
I work with lots of H-1Bs. Very nice people, some very smart but the ability to read, speak, write, and understand English is never as good as a person raised in the US even if that person was the lowest performer in college. Your child is far better off with that person than the the H-1B as a teacher.
So the worst qualified native English speaker would be a far better teacher than the best qualified foreigner just because their English skills are better? That's a ridiculous statement, particularly in science and math.
Anonymous wrote:NO.
I work with lots of H-1Bs. Very nice people, some very smart but the ability to read, speak, write, and understand English is never as good as a person raised in the US even if that person was the lowest performer in college. Your child is far better off with that person than the the H-1B as a teacher.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NO.
I work with lots of H-1Bs. Very nice people, some very smart but the ability to read, speak, write, and understand English is never as good as a person raised in the US even if that person was the lowest performer in college. Your child is far better off with that person than the the H-1B as a teacher.
Now you're just being a troll.They may not be as good in the language, but they are still teachers who are well versed in their area of expertise.
Anonymous wrote:NO.
I work with lots of H-1Bs. Very nice people, some very smart but the ability to read, speak, write, and understand English is never as good as a person raised in the US even if that person was the lowest performer in college. Your child is far better off with that person than the the H-1B as a teacher.
They may not be as good in the language, but they are still teachers who are well versed in their area of expertise.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Look into it, but I think teaching is one of those careers where it helps to have someone who understands the culture/community of the school/students. It's not just about subject matter, it's about prioritizing certain things. For example, whereas rote memorization is still a large part of education in other countries, it really is not in the US. Also you need more than subject knowledge to teach. You need to be able to make the material engaging and accessible. A lot of that requires being able to relate to the kids.
--teacher, child of immigrants
Majority of the US teachers don't understand their subject matter well enough to teach conceptually, while most of them are quite confident and feel superior than their foreign counterpart. The truth is that without solid subject knowledge, there is noway to make the material "engaging and accessible" to students. It might appear that the students are engaged and having fun, but what's the point if they are not obtaining true knowledge. This is especially true in the STEM fields.
Anonymous wrote:I posted on another thread about what it's like for Filipino teachers to work in Baltimore City schools. Watch "The Learning" on Amazon Prime to show how overwhelmed these Filipino teachers were to deal with inner city students. These teachers are well respected back home and then are placed in pretty bad schools where it doesn't really matter how well they know their subject area. None of it matters if you don't have excellent classroom management skills.
Anonymous wrote:Look into it, but I think teaching is one of those careers where it helps to have someone who understands the culture/community of the school/students. It's not just about subject matter, it's about prioritizing certain things. For example, whereas rote memorization is still a large part of education in other countries, it really is not in the US. Also you need more than subject knowledge to teach. You need to be able to make the material engaging and accessible. A lot of that requires being able to relate to the kids.
--teacher, child of immigrants
Anonymous wrote:Nope. The problem is not the number of qualified applicants - there are always MANY qualified applicants per job opening - but the sclerotic hiring process.
Anonymous wrote:Look into it, but I think teaching is one of those careers where it helps to have someone who understands the culture/community of the school/students. It's not just about subject matter, it's about prioritizing certain things. For example, whereas rote memorization is still a large part of education in other countries, it really is not in the US. Also you need more than subject knowledge to teach. You need to be able to make the material engaging and accessible. A lot of that requires being able to relate to the kids.
--teacher, child of immigrants
Anonymous wrote:Also just because someone has strong knowledge of a subject area doesn't necessarily mean that they would be good at teaching it. Some college professors might be an example of this.
Anonymous wrote:Look into it, but I think teaching is one of those careers where it helps to have someone who understands the culture/community of the school/students. It's not just about subject matter, it's about prioritizing certain things. For example, whereas rote memorization is still a large part of education in other countries, it really is not in the US. Also you need more than subject knowledge to teach. You need to be able to make the material engaging and accessible. A lot of that requires being able to relate to the kids.
--teacher, child of immigrants