Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Mundo Verde has 44 K slots this year. Is this an expansion year or did they have a mass exodus?
They always expand at K.
Anonymous wrote:Mundo Verde has 44 K slots this year. Is this an expansion year or did they have a mass exodus?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:CMI offered more seats in more grades than last couple of years.
Thinking their data was submitted incorrectly. If taken at face value there were zero slots pk4-7 (inclusive). That's just not possible. No school in DC has 100% reenrollment.
CMI didn't offer seats for those grades in the initial round for 16-17, but if you scroll down you see they did make a number of WL offers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:CMI offered more seats in more grades than last couple of years.
Thinking their data was submitted incorrectly. If taken at face value there were zero slots pk4-7 (inclusive). That's just not possible. No school in DC has 100% reenrollment.
That's not what it says, they offered, starting at PK3
55
4
5
1
1
0
0
14
19
3
Relax, Francis. My response was in reply to someone who commented on CMI offering more seats than in prior years. My response noted that the prior year's reported data was very unlikely to have been accurate with all zeros. It is a comparison thing. Watch you don't fall off your high horsey and hurt your pretty little head.
Anonymous wrote:Stuart Hobson showing 1's for all three years, down from prior years. Will be interesting to see if their WL #s reflect the reduced number of projected seats. Don't want to get ahead of myself here, but maybe this is the beginning of the elusive CH MS...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:CMI offered more seats in more grades than last couple of years.
Thinking their data was submitted incorrectly. If taken at face value there were zero slots pk4-7 (inclusive). That's just not possible. No school in DC has 100% reenrollment.
That's not what it says, they offered, starting at PK3
55
4
5
1
1
0
0
14
19
3
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:CMI offered more seats in more grades than last couple of years.
Thinking their data was submitted incorrectly. If taken at face value there were zero slots pk4-7 (inclusive). That's just not possible. No school in DC has 100% reenrollment.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:CMI offered more seats in more grades than last couple of years.
Looks like they grew PK3 size. Quite a few seats offered in 5th. Are parents peeling off to Latin/BASIS?
Or Hardy, Deal, or private..
(But they weren't 6th grade seats, they were 5th grade seats)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:CMI offered more seats in more grades than last couple of years.
Thinking their data was submitted incorrectly. If taken at face value there were zero slots pk4-7 (inclusive). That's just not possible. No school in DC has 100% reenrollment.
Anonymous wrote:CMI offered more seats in more grades than last couple of years.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:CMI offered more seats in more grades than last couple of years.
Looks like they grew PK3 size. Quite a few seats offered in 5th. Are parents peeling off to Latin/BASIS?
Or Hardy, Deal, or private..
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:CMI offered more seats in more grades than last couple of years.
Looks like they grew PK3 size. Quite a few seats offered in 5th. Are parents peeling off to Latin/BASIS?
Anonymous wrote:CMI offered more seats in more grades than last couple of years.