Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Don't care about whatever hand signal he may or may not have flashed. I had problems with what he said, "the President must not be questioned..." FU Stephen Miller. In a democracy, we question the President. Just like the GOP did for the past 8 years. At least, President Obama didn't need help from Russia to win his election.

Wait. I thought the GOP only questioned the President because they're racists. Now the line is that it's a reasonable thing for opposing parties to do?

Huh.

Different people hold different opinions. Liberals don't live and die by party sound bites. Weird, I know. It comes with free thought and intelligence.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Daily Caller
Breitbart
Gateway Pundit
Huffington Post

You are an idiot if you read any of these.

Reading different viewpoints does not make one an idiot.

NP... The homeless drunk who lives under a bridge also has a "viewpoint" which is as much schlock as the ones above. Only difference is that the President and his staff, i.e Bannon isn't listening to the homeless drunk guy ranting, but they apparently do listen to the Breitbart and Gateway Pundit. And the difference is that Breitbart and Gateway Pundit's angry ranting will actually end up hurting people.

Wow. But Daily Kos, Democracy Now, Crooks and Liars, Democratic Underground, and Mother Jones won't? The people who believe the drivel that comes out of those "sources" are as ignorant as they come.

How on earth did you include Mother Jones in that list? They have won too many awards for journalistic excellence to be included. Maybe you should question the sources you read. They have led you astray.

Anonymous wrote:I totally believe this (old) news story. SM is a fascistic provocateur. Did you see him on the morning shows. He spoke in a practiced barked staccato cadence emulating Hitler. I saw a video of him when he was in high school acting as a racist bully and provocateur and he did not speak in the fascist cadence. His hand positions in the hand-signal photos are too awkward and unusual to be anything else.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Don't care about whatever hand signal he may or may not have flashed. I had problems with what he said, "the President must not be questioned..." FU Stephen Miller. In a democracy, we question the President. Just like the GOP did for the past 8 years. At least, President Obama didn't need help from Russia to win his election.

Wait. I thought the GOP only questioned the President because they're racists. Now the line is that it's a reasonable thing for opposing parties to do?

Huh.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Don't care about whatever hand signal he may or may not have flashed. I had problems with what he said, "the President must not be questioned..." FU Stephen Miller. In a democracy, we question the President. Just like the GOP did for the past 8 years. At least, President Obama didn't need help from Russia to win his election.

Wait. I thought the GOP only questioned the President because they're racists. Now the line is that it's a reasonable thing for opposing parties to do?

Huh.

Anonymous wrote:Don't care about whatever hand signal he may or may not have flashed. I had problems with what he said, "the President must not be questioned..." FU Stephen Miller. In a democracy, we question the President. Just like the GOP did for the past 8 years. At least, President Obama didn't need help from Russia to win his election.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Daily Caller
Breitbart
Gateway Pundit
Huffington Post

You are an idiot if you read any of these.

Reading different viewpoints does not make one an idiot.

NP... The homeless drunk who lives under a bridge also has a "viewpoint" which is as much schlock as the ones above. Only difference is that the President and his staff, i.e Bannon isn't listening to the homeless drunk guy ranting, but they apparently do listen to the Breitbart and Gateway Pundit. And the difference is that Breitbart and Gateway Pundit's angry ranting will actually end up hurting people.

Wow. But Daily Kos, Democracy Now, Crooks and Liars, Democratic Underground, and Mother Jones won't? The people who believe the drivel that comes out of those "sources" are as ignorant as they come.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Daily Caller
Breitbart
Gateway Pundit
Huffington Post

You are an idiot if you read any of these.

Reading different viewpoints does not make one an idiot.

Reading unreliable news sources does.

Reading them isn't the problem, believing them is. There is a difference.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Daily Caller
Breitbart
Gateway Pundit
Huffington Post

You are an idiot if you read any of these.

Reading different viewpoints does not make one an idiot.

Reading unreliable news sources does.

What does "unreliable" mean. Something that doesn't fit your biased assumption about what news is? Sorry, the real idiot is the one categorically rejecting ideas based on the source, rather than on the idea.

Good God. The publications mentioned above are too ideologically aligned (both right and left) to be viewed as reliable news sources. They exist on both ends of the political spectrum. Thinking that Breitbart brings you the unvarnished truth while the Huffington Post is lies and propaganda (or vice versa) speaks to your issues with the reality.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Daily Caller
Breitbart
Gateway Pundit
Huffington Post

You are an idiot if you read any of these.

Reading different viewpoints does not make one an idiot.

NP... The homeless drunk who lives under a bridge also has a "viewpoint" which is as much schlock as the ones above. Only difference is that the President and his staff, i.e Bannon isn't listening to the homeless drunk guy ranting, but they apparently do listen to the Breitbart and Gateway Pundit. And the difference is that Breitbart and Gateway Pundit's angry ranting will actually end up hurting people.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is there a reason you are discussing the views of a minor pundit from two weeks ago?

I believe this is the person who is absolutely obsessed with celebrities s/he disagrees with. Nuttily obsessed.