Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:can't wait for one in S Arl.
Why do you need one? Claremont, Campbell, and Drew too diverse for you? Just apply to ATS and you can always go private if that doesn't work out. Or are you hoping they'll open a charter like Belton Academy in South Carolina that will “stress free market entrepreneurism and competition and emphasize traditional values.” I see you, neighbor.
Out of bounds for Claremont and it's a slim chance to get into ATS, or Campbell. We will go private and would love a voucher for that. [/quote
FYI everyone I know who wanted to go to Clarement got in off the waitlist last summer, including those that were out of bounds. They also let you go to Key if you don't get into Claremont.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, of course. But then I'm pro-choice.
The no people can, of course, choose not to enroll.
That's not how this works. Because you're siphoning money away from my school to give you that "choice." Public schools can have all those programs or educational focuses, without becoming charters that can refuse to enroll students and that aren't held accountable to the same set of standards.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:can't wait for one in S Arl.
Why do you need one? Claremont, Campbell, and Drew too diverse for you? Just apply to ATS and you can always go private if that doesn't work out. Or are you hoping they'll open a charter like Belton Academy in South Carolina that will “stress free market entrepreneurism and competition and emphasize traditional values.” I see you, neighbor.
Anonymous wrote:God, no, no charter schools. Studies show they don't work, and if they are for-profit, they are likely to be god-awful. Profit and education don't mix.
Anonymous wrote:can't wait for one in S Arl.
Anonymous wrote:can't wait for one in S Arl.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No. I don't hear people clamoring for charter schools in Virginia. Why would legislators encourage them without support from the voters?
Because the Department of Education said so.
Anonymous wrote:Yes, of course. But then I'm pro-choice.
The no people can, of course, choose not to enroll.