Anonymous wrote:As a former social worker, literally <1% of poor families would send their kids to Sidwell, let alone off to boarding school. It's difficult to comprehend the parental stupidity and neglect.
Birth control and welfare reform is the only real way to tackle this. People that shouldn't have babies have the most.
Anonymous wrote:I am an elementary school teacher in a high poverty school and we have a lot of students who struggle. Sometimes when they're in middle school and high school they come visit and I get to see how they're doing. One such student came back this week. He was retained when he was in 2nd grade and struggled throughout school. He's a senior this year and I asked what his plans are for next year. He looked a little ashamed and said he is going to MC and will study how to be a mechanic. He's always been interested in that field but he has struggled in traditional classes.
I told him that I was so proud of him for identifying something he's interested in and is figuring out how to make a career out of it. It is sad that these kids are made to feel like a traditional 4 year college or university is the only socially acceptable path. It's also sad there aren't more options like the Edison program in MCPS. The school system needs to realize that plenty of kids want to learn how to take a path other than the one that is crammed down their throat.
Anonymous wrote:Mandatory school until 17. Hold them back over and over. Summer school. There are no lost causes. Everyone can learn. Do not give these students a chance to give up on themselves.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Best case for them would be remedial year of school in small groups, readily available contraception, full day, tons of positive role models (to reverse the trend where achieving is uncool as someone noted).
Minimize influence from parents and maximize external good influence, kind of like a boarding school maybe.
Holy god. You'd defend Native American boarding schools, too. Why is it only white parents get choice? Everyone else gets compelled as bad parents.
Anonymous wrote:
"Or" would be better than "yes".
We really need to taker a closer look at what Germany's doing with their education system. We have pretty much outsourced much of our manufacturing and turned into a service society which consists of much lower paying jobs. In contrast, Germany retained a robust manufacturing and is very developed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Many of these students, esp. inner city and poor rural are 3-5 grade levels behind by 9th. How do students like this succeed or are they already lost causes?
Way too much focus on poor kids. MOST public school kids in general are three grade levels off par by high school. Middle class families are clueless about this.
Anonymous wrote:Many of these students, esp. inner city and poor rural are 3-5 grade levels behind by 9th. How do students like this succeed or are they already lost causes?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Some kids end up like this due to poor or inconsistent education or to learning disabilities.
Many however, end up in this position because they just learn slowly. They aren't that quick to learn. Frankly they aren't that bright.
But everyone should be college and career ready.
Are you being sarcastic?
No, not "everyone" should go to college.
Anonymous wrote:Best case for them would be remedial year of school in small groups, readily available contraception, full day, tons of positive role models (to reverse the trend where achieving is uncool as someone noted).
Minimize influence from parents and maximize external good influence, kind of like a boarding school maybe.