Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Regional and national universities and liberal arts colleges seem to be putting less and less stock in GPAs and rank in class as the years go by, and more and more emphasis on standardized test scores, interview reports, evidence of intellectual curiosity and maturity for age, and co-curricular and extra-curricular accomplishments. It's a rational trend, since earning an A average at one school can entail roughly the same amount of work of earning a B, or even a C, average at another school with higher standards (and higher-performing students).
And some of the greatest mind in history had notoriously bad grades in school because they just weren't cut out for the routines of the masses.
Anonymous wrote:Regional and national universities and liberal arts colleges seem to be putting less and less stock in GPAs and rank in class as the years go by, and more and more emphasis on standardized test scores, interview reports, evidence of intellectual curiosity and maturity for age, and co-curricular and extra-curricular accomplishments. It's a rational trend, since earning an A average at one school can entail roughly the same amount of work of earning a B, or even a C, average at another school with higher standards (and higher-performing students).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The point is, it's meaningless to call a class that's tailored to be accessible for every student an "Honors" class. Relative to what? If it's the only option available, it's not an Honors class. Debate all you want about whether it's a good thing or bad thing to have all the kids taking the same class, but to label it Honors is just doublespeak. And personally I expect a certain level of intellectual honesty and integrity from school leaders, so this kind of window dressing is disappointing.
By keeping the class designated as HOnors, it means that the grade is weighted in every students GPA. It will effectively inflate everyone's GPA. I would be concerned that once colleges catch on to this, they would be somewhat skeptical of high GPAs from Wilson.
Anonymous wrote:The point is, it's meaningless to call a class that's tailored to be accessible for every student an "Honors" class. Relative to what? If it's the only option available, it's not an Honors class. Debate all you want about whether it's a good thing or bad thing to have all the kids taking the same class, but to label it Honors is just doublespeak. And personally I expect a certain level of intellectual honesty and integrity from school leaders, so this kind of window dressing is disappointing.
Anonymous wrote:What will stop her from pulling this for all classes. AP calc for all!!!
Anonymous wrote:From the article, if anyone bothered to read it all the way through:
"Martin said the classes will continue to be officially designated as Honors courses and that the curriculum for the courses will be considered, “modified, adopted, Honors curriculum, but [still] Honors curriculum.”
I read that as there being different levels within the same curriculum. Some kids will take the full Honors curriculum while others will take a modified version.
OP, your kid will sit next to kids that are able to handle the full Honors curriculum.
-A Wilson parent
Anonymous wrote:Please do show us the research showing that the high achieving students aren't impacted in a measurable way. Easy to say, hard to prove. So will Wilson honors classes now be considered a joke to college admissions?
Anonymous wrote:Please do show us the research showing that the high achieving students aren't impacted in a measurable way. Easy to say, hard to prove. So will Wilson honors classes now be considered a joke to college admissions?
Anonymous wrote:Especially if they are trying to close the achievement gap, the research shows that when struggling kids are in class with high achievers it benefits the struggling kids and does no measurable harm to the high achievers.