Anonymous wrote:The issue is that if the job description is one covered by the CBU, and they are working at the school, then they are covered by the CBU no matter who is paying them. So if the PTA is not complying with the union contract, the employer (which will be deemed DCPS and the PTA jointly) are in violation of the CBA. The contracts with any personnel must be carefully drafted to ensure that they are not in the CBU. This is relatively easy to ensure (e.g. classroom aid works less then 70 hours in a two-week cycle), and most PTAs have lawyers triple check this to make sure they are complying with all laws.
But if the PTA were to say, hire a classroom teacher to teach math to half of the class full time ... that person is entitled to everything in the CBA. I highly doubt any principal would allow this to happen. Which is why the Janney poster who says her kid has 2 or 3 "teachers" is wrong -- or is exposing a problem at Janney; most likely just wrong.
Student teachers brought in through agreements with Universities for class credit are a different category. Mann and Murch have a lot of those working with classroom teachers. Janney probably does too.
Anonymous wrote:A bunch of the WOTP schools raise money through the PTAs for classroom aides or whatever the title - particularly in the young grades. Yes, at Mann they have them for every grade. At most of the others, it's just for preK-1st. Not sure about janney.
Anonymous wrote:"As a Janney parent, I don't think there's a ton of transparency on what is PTA-paid for vs. DCPS-paid for. I say this as someone who doesn't go to PTA meetings (admittedly) so perhaps if I went, I would learn this. But it's not like there's a line item breakdown of where the money goes. I have a general belief that the PTA pays for the extra custodial staff, and the extra staff around during recess (my child reports that the afterschool staff is usually there during recess, and I assume this isn't on DCPS dime). But no clue about who pays for partner/co teachers after"
There actually is a good amount of transparency if you go to the meeting and see the budget, although I haven't paid attention in a few years so I can't answer OP's question. But I can say that except for a few aides in pre-K/K years, I don't know any staff member with "teacher" in his/her title who does not have a B.A. at the very minimum. In fact, how about this. I'll post the bios that are available on the Janney website, which shows that the vast majority of the teachers - whether "co-teacher," "partner teacher" or "teacher - either have or are working on their masters.
http://www.janneyschool.org/about/teacher-bios/#rushing
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:These teachers have a choice. They can select to be employed by DCPS or not.
It is not as if the Janney PTA is limiting their ability for employment. Janney PTA offered a position, they accepted. They know what DCPS offers - it is not a secret.
What? So confused. The teachers work for DCPS. Always have and always will.
Anonymous wrote:These teachers have a choice. They can select to be employed by DCPS or not.
It is not as if the Janney PTA is limiting their ability for employment. Janney PTA offered a position, they accepted. They know what DCPS offers - it is not a secret.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As a Janney parent, I don't think there's a ton of transparency on what is PTA-paid for vs. DCPS-paid for. I say this as someone who doesn't go to PTA meetings (admittedly) so perhaps if I went, I would learn this. But it's not like there's a line item breakdown of where the money goes. I have a general belief that the PTA pays for the extra custodial staff, and the extra staff around during recess (my child reports that the afterschool staff is usually there during recess, and I assume this isn't on DCPS dime). But no clue about who pays for partner/co teachers after K.
I doubt the PTA employs people in positions covered by DCPS collective bargaining agreements. That would be ... interesting.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As a Janney parent, I don't think there's a ton of transparency on what is PTA-paid for vs. DCPS-paid for. I say this as someone who doesn't go to PTA meetings (admittedly) so perhaps if I went, I would learn this. But it's not like there's a line item breakdown of where the money goes. I have a general belief that the PTA pays for the extra custodial staff, and the extra staff around during recess (my child reports that the afterschool staff is usually there during recess, and I assume this isn't on DCPS dime). But no clue about who pays for partner/co teachers after K.
I doubt the PTA employs people in positions covered by DCPS collective bargaining agreements. That would be ... interesting.
Anonymous wrote:As a Janney parent, I don't think there's a ton of transparency on what is PTA-paid for vs. DCPS-paid for. I say this as someone who doesn't go to PTA meetings (admittedly) so perhaps if I went, I would learn this. But it's not like there's a line item breakdown of where the money goes. I have a general belief that the PTA pays for the extra custodial staff, and the extra staff around during recess (my child reports that the afterschool staff is usually there during recess, and I assume this isn't on DCPS dime). But no clue about who pays for partner/co teachers after K.