Anonymous wrote:I don't get why people rave about pressure cookers. I have a slow cooker. So far the main food item that posters (except the Indian poster, who did have more uses) have raved about in a pressure cooker is hard boiled eggs, and count me as someone who doesn't want a separate appliance for that!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't get why people rave about pressure cookers. I have a slow cooker. So far the main food item that posters (except the Indian poster, who did have more uses) have raved about in a pressure cooker is hard boiled eggs, and count me as someone who doesn't want a separate appliance for that!
I dont get the raving about using ith to make rice, boil eggs, or make oatmeal. The things people cite are quite possibly the easiest things to make with a plain old pan.
I dont have an instant pot, but do have a pressure cooker (stovetop) and use it a ton for real cooking. Curries, stews, dried legumes and stock. What i like about it is that i can make meals that normally have long cook times and cook them quickly and the meat doesn't dry out. Personally I'd never use an electric pressure cooker because it takes longer than the stovetop. If I buy an appliance to save time, i want the most time saving one out out there.
Anonymous wrote:I don't get why people rave about pressure cookers. I have a slow cooker. So far the main food item that posters (except the Indian poster, who did have more uses) have raved about in a pressure cooker is hard boiled eggs, and count me as someone who doesn't want a separate appliance for that!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If I am doing 1 or 2 eggs I use the electric kettle but if you're doing a batch for deviled eggs there is no substitute. Something about pressure cooking makes the shells come away so easily.
Actully its old eggs that make the shells come off easily. It's a PH thing.
It's more than that. I've done older eggs on the stove and its easier than really fresh eggs, but still nothing compared to pressure cooked eggs. I was skeptical until I tried it, but it was truly a huge difference.
I mainly use it as a conventional slow cooker, but I love that I can sautéed in the same pot and then just switch over to slow cooking. I also use it for rice a lot.
It really takes me a good 30 seconds to peel an egg. 20 seconds saved for me doesn't warrant a new appliance to store.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If I am doing 1 or 2 eggs I use the electric kettle but if you're doing a batch for deviled eggs there is no substitute. Something about pressure cooking makes the shells come away so easily.
Actully its old eggs that make the shells come off easily. It's a PH thing.
It's more than that. I've done older eggs on the stove and its easier than really fresh eggs, but still nothing compared to pressure cooked eggs. I was skeptical until I tried it, but it was truly a huge difference.
I mainly use it as a conventional slow cooker, but I love that I can sautéed in the same pot and then just switch over to slow cooking. I also use it for rice a lot.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If I am doing 1 or 2 eggs I use the electric kettle but if you're doing a batch for deviled eggs there is no substitute. Something about pressure cooking makes the shells come away so easily.
Actully its old eggs that make the shells come off easily. It's a PH thing.
Anonymous wrote:If I am doing 1 or 2 eggs I use the electric kettle but if you're doing a batch for deviled eggs there is no substitute. Something about pressure cooking makes the shells come away so easily.
Anonymous wrote:If I am doing 1 or 2 eggs I use the electric kettle but if you're doing a batch for deviled eggs there is no substitute. Something about pressure cooking makes the shells come away so easily.