Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'd tell him I'm considering disowning him. I know it's not a popular opinion here, but I feel just as strongly that no child of mine will have a job that involves guns or the military.
OP, have you talked extensively with your son about your two friends who died?
You're an idiot. That's a great way to drive a teenager deeper into their commitment to doing whatever you don't want them to do.
Also, hope you enjoy going to work every day knowing how much of your taxes go to the military!
I'm the PP with three military kids, one of whom was seriously injured in Afghanistan. I'm grateful that the majority of people appreciate our men and women in uniform. I'm saddened that a parent - any parent - would ever consider "disowning" a child for any reason. There is absolutely nothing my kids could ever do or say that would lead me to even have that thought. Rather than be angry with this poster, we should feel sad. This is a parent incapable of unconditional love. Can you imagine what it must be like for her children. Unfortunately, those wounds are hard to heal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'd tell him I'm considering disowning him. I know it's not a popular opinion here, but I feel just as strongly that no child of mine will have a job that involves guns or the military.
OP, have you talked extensively with your son about your two friends who died?
You're an idiot. That's a great way to drive a teenager deeper into their commitment to doing whatever you don't want them to do.
Also, hope you enjoy going to work every day knowing how much of your taxes go to the military!
I'm the PP with three military kids, one of whom was seriously injured in Afghanistan. I'm grateful that the majority of people appreciate our men and women in uniform. I'm saddened that a parent - any parent - would ever consider "disowning" a child for any reason. There is absolutely nothing my kids could ever do or say that would lead me to even have that thought. Rather than be angry with this poster, we should feel sad. This is a parent incapable of unconditional love. Can you imagine what it must be like for her children. Unfortunately, those wounds are hard to heal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'd tell him I'm considering disowning him. I know it's not a popular opinion here, but I feel just as strongly that no child of mine will have a job that involves guns or the military.
OP, have you talked extensively with your son about your two friends who died?
You're an idiot. That's a great way to drive a teenager deeper into their commitment to doing whatever you don't want them to do.
Also, hope you enjoy going to work every day knowing how much of your taxes go to the military!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'd tell him I'm considering disowning him. I know it's not a popular opinion here, but I feel just as strongly that no child of mine will have a job that involves guns or the military.
OP, have you talked extensively with your son about your two friends who died?
You're an idiot. That's a great way to drive a teenager deeper into their commitment to doing whatever you don't want them to do.
Also, hope you enjoy going to work every day knowing how much of your taxes go to the military!
I'm an idiot whose kids are both alive, and aren't debilitated by PTSD or survivor guilt. I'll take it. And I'm fine with my taxes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
ROTC definitely is easier to get out of in the first 2 years than the service academy.
No, that's not true. You can walk away from a service academy any time in the first two years and have no commitment and no payback for those two years of college. Other colleges accept transfers from service academies with ease because they know how high the academic standards are there.
I'm talking about socially/emotionally how difficult it is to leave when it is all you're surrounded by. Going to a "regular" university with a good ROTC program will show the kid both sides of the coin.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
ROTC definitely is easier to get out of in the first 2 years than the service academy.
No, that's not true. You can walk away from a service academy any time in the first two years and have no commitment and no payback for those two years of college. Other colleges accept transfers from service academies with ease because they know how high the academic standards are there.
Anonymous wrote:Thank you, PP with the 3 military kids, for your sacrifice and for sharing your story. Food for thought.
-OP
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is he a freshman or a sophmore? Especially if he's a freshman, my advice would be to work on letting go. Let him research and share with you, but don't get emotionally involved either way. There's a good chance he'll change his mind.
If he does continue down the path, I'd STRONGLY push him to ROTC. But you can decide that later. For now, the healthiest thing to do is let it be.
All conversations about it can be summed up as "Wow" "Cool" or "Bummer." Stay emotionally neutral. Let him do his own research and pursuit, and be supportive but not invested. If it gets to junior or senior year and he wants to continue pursuing it, then become more invested (and push for ROTC -- easier to get out of than a service academy).
That's not true at all. Please don't discuss what you don't know.
--USNA '90
ROTC definitely is easier to get out of in the first 2 years than the service academy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is he a freshman or a sophmore? Especially if he's a freshman, my advice would be to work on letting go. Let him research and share with you, but don't get emotionally involved either way. There's a good chance he'll change his mind.
If he does continue down the path, I'd STRONGLY push him to ROTC. But you can decide that later. For now, the healthiest thing to do is let it be.
All conversations about it can be summed up as "Wow" "Cool" or "Bummer." Stay emotionally neutral. Let him do his own research and pursuit, and be supportive but not invested. If it gets to junior or senior year and he wants to continue pursuing it, then become more invested (and push for ROTC -- easier to get out of than a service academy).
That's not true at all. Please don't discuss what you don't know.
--USNA '90
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm not going to flip out on him. I remember being a teen and I know that a parental freakout is a great way to get him to dig in his heels. And I have told him quite honestly about my friends who died and how I feel about it, but he is a teenager and of course seems to assume he is invincible.
PP is right that he is young and may well change his mind. I encouraged him to look at defense contractors and things like that, as he is very engineering-minded and likes design. I'd rather him have a career helping the military than actually out there fighting. I just don't know if that will satisfy him. There's a huge part of him that just seems to want to put his ass on the line for something he sees as noble.
It's not easy to have a good career with a defense contractor without military service. There are also options in the military that are much less...militaristic, for lack of a better word, than others. Take a look at the Navy or Air Force, there are many technical jobs that aren't alway "boots on the ground".
I agree...Navy or Air Force as long as he doesn't have any intention of being a pilot. Army or Marine Corps will land you in the desert.
Navy and Air Force are the "cushier" jobs but many of them are landing in the desert and front lines. We have Air Force friends in career fields that never carried a gun and they were placed front lines.
