Anonymous wrote:Pretty unfair that people making 300k have a 35% marginal tax rate and certain millionaires/billionaires are paying nothing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Pretty unfair that people making 300k have a 35% marginal tax rate and certain millionaires/billionaires are paying nothing.
Very true.
Thank God Hillary and all her donors lost.
Let's hope Trump does what he promised he'd do.
Anonymous wrote:Pretty unfair that people making 300k have a 35% marginal tax rate and certain millionaires/billionaires are paying nothing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Needing to pay AMT would be a dream come true for most Americans.
Just a little reality check folks.
Supporting a severely disabled child on the AMT - we're totally broke and close to bankruptcy.
No fancy vacations, old cars, medium sized house with huge issues, two kids. In the Washington area it's not such a special income.
+1, we made a few thousand over and got hit with the AMT. We have a small house (not even medium) with many issues, old cars and live very modestly. We do spend a fortune on therapies.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I tried the married filing separately and our bill was higher but I am a SAHM.
And you declared zero income?
Yes, I have no income - no part-time. Maybe a drop in investments, but not much. I used of the computer programs that caculates both filed jointly and married filed seperately.
Are you trying to be funny?
Anonymous wrote:Pretty unfair that people making 300k have a 35% marginal tax rate and certain millionaires/billionaires are paying nothing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I tried the married filing separately and our bill was higher but I am a SAHM.
And you declared zero income?
Yes, I have no income - no part-time. Maybe a drop in investments, but not much. I used of the computer programs that caculates both filed jointly and married filed seperately.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Needing to pay AMT would be a dream come true for most Americans.
Just a little reality check folks.
Supporting a severely disabled child on the AMT - we're totally broke and close to bankruptcy.
No fancy vacations, old cars, medium sized house with huge issues, two kids. In the Washington area it's not such a special income.
Anonymous wrote:Needing to pay AMT would be a dream come true for most Americans.
Just a little reality check folks.
Anonymous wrote:Needing to pay AMT would be a dream come true for most Americans.
Just a little reality check folks.
Anonymous wrote:It puzzels me when people say you need to make more to avoid the AMT. it is like people hate the word not more taxes.
AMT forces certain midrange incomes (mostly in the 25%-28% tax bracket with certain deduction) to pay taxes using the AMT formula which only has two brackets (26%-28%). If a good chunk of your income falls above the 33% bracket then of course you are not paying the AMT but you are paying even more taxes.
I do not know if this will make everyone feel better but think of it as we are all riding the same train and at a certain station we need to get off and ride the AMT train for a bit. Then you get off on the next stop and hop back on the old track. I am not jealous of the people who never pay the AMT; they are less fortunate than I am. I am not jealous of people who don't pay the AMT because they make too much; they have already been there and paid their dues and then paying some more.
Anonymous wrote:I'm curious - what is your MAGI? Ours went up this year and I'm wondering if we're also going to get slammed with AMT. We don't have a ton of deductions (just mortgage, local tax and some charity).