Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I want to know if Madeline Albright - you know the one who said there is a special place in hell for women who don't support other women when she was urging women to vote for Hillary - will be there for the march.

This march is not a litmus test, you can support it without even marching. You can support it by marching in another march in another city/town.

You can support the march by saying it is great and wonderful to your sad sack employees and laughing when they return to their cubes, leaving the grown ups to serious business

This march deserves the hypocrisy it has generated

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I want to know if Madeline Albright - you know the one who said there is a special place in hell for women who don't support other women when she was urging women to vote for Hillary - will be there for the march.

This march is not a litmus test, you can support it without even marching. You can support it by marching in another march in another city/town.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I want to know if Madeline Albright - you know the one who said there is a special place in hell for women who don't support other women when she was urging women to vote for Hillary - will be there for the march.

I'm sure Madeline Albright has and continues to do plenty for women that doesn't involve marching.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some people may feel it would be wrong of her to grab the spotlight. She spent decades serving her country. I don't think I would judge her differently if she was not ready to attend one march, the day after her opponent is sworn into office.

Serving our country? Escalating wars, unsecured server, money laundering, invading countries that were no threat to the USA, Benghazi, et al is serving the devil, not America.

No. The Devil is going to be sworn in as President on Friday and it is damn sure she wasn't serving him but, obviously, you are. I hope you spend eternity in Hell with President Beelzebub.

Those are some very ignorant assumptions. I don't think it is very Christian of you to tell someone you don't even know that you hope they spend eternity in hell. Do you do this with anybody who disagrees with your political beliefs? Check yourself before you get in your self righteous soap box.

Right back at you. Maybe the PP is a Jew - or (cringe!) a Muslim - or just someone who doesn't give a rat's ass what faith Trump or you pretend to be. 'Good Christians' would recognize the threat that an emotionally stunted sociopathic narcissist poses to the rest of the world.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I want to know if Madeline Albright - you know the one who said there is a special place in hell for women who don't support other women when she was urging women to vote for Hillary - will be there for the march.

I'm sure Madeline Albright has and continues to do plenty for women that doesn't involve marching.

Anonymous wrote:I want to know if Madeline Albright - you know the one who said there is a special place in hell for women who don't support other women when she was urging women to vote for Hillary - will be there for the march.

Anonymous wrote:I want to know if Madeline Albright - you know the one who said there is a special place in hell for women who don't support other women when she was urging women to vote for Hillary - will be there for the march.

Anonymous wrote:I voted for HRC and I'm waiting to see what happens on Saturday but I'm not optimistic.

This woman who told the world that women's rights are human rights; is she going to drop out now that she didn't achieve her goal?

We showed up for her. Will she show up for us now that she has nothing to gain? She will be in town on Friday. Waiting to see what happens on Saturday.

Anonymous wrote:I want to know if Madeline Albright - you know the one who said there is a special place in hell for women who don't support other women when she was urging women to vote for Hillary - will be there for the march.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some people may feel it would be wrong of her to grab the spotlight. She spent decades serving her country. I don't think I would judge her differently if she was not ready to attend one march, the day after her opponent is sworn into office.

Serving our country? Escalating wars, unsecured server, money laundering, invading countries that were no threat to the USA, Benghazi, et al is serving the devil, not America.

No. The Devil is going to be sworn in as President on Friday and it is damn sure she wasn't serving him but, obviously, you are. I hope you spend eternity in Hell with President Beelzebub.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some people may feel it would be wrong of her to grab the spotlight. She spent decades serving her country. I don't think I would judge her differently if she was not ready to attend one march, the day after her opponent is sworn into office.

Serving our country? Escalating wars, unsecured server, money laundering, invading countries that were no threat to the USA, Benghazi, et al is serving the devil, not America.

ALL LIES.
She might go. She may not wish to force her self into another round of "she grabbed the spotlight! Bitch!" again. USSS might not think she should attend.

And about 80,000 more of us needed to show up than did

ALL LIES? Come now, most of that is true, there's some hyping of it here. But things like HRC's warmongering aren't exactly 'fake news'. The woman bragged for years in public about getting bill to bomb during the Kosovo conflict. To many Russia watchers, that's when the Russians turned against the west in a way that lead to Putin.

ALL LIES. I think you mean to say she was glad to have convinced Bill to intervene. That's not "warmongering," that intervention. We can debate whether or not intervention was the correct thing to do, but it's telling that Republicans (and that's what you sound like) have to lie to make a point.

BHO regards Libya as the greatest failure of his Presidency. Who pushed for that intervention?

HRC on Syria? Warmongering.

HRC on the Iraq vote? She voted yes and did so without reading the NIE. She was running for President even then, everyone knew that, and instead of doing her job and evaluating the facts, she joined the crowd and made up some mealy-mouthed nonsense about need to confront Saddam Hussein. Warmongering.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some people may feel it would be wrong of her to grab the spotlight. She spent decades serving her country. I don't think I would judge her differently if she was not ready to attend one march, the day after her opponent is sworn into office.

Serving our country? Escalating wars, unsecured server, money laundering, invading countries that were no threat to the USA, Benghazi, et al is serving the devil, not America.

ALL LIES.
She might go. She may not wish to force her self into another round of "she grabbed the spotlight! Bitch!" again. USSS might not think she should attend.

And about 80,000 more of us needed to show up than did

ALL LIES? Come now, most of that is true, there's some hyping of it here. But things like HRC's warmongering aren't exactly 'fake news'. The woman bragged for years in public about getting bill to bomb during the Kosovo conflict. To many Russia watchers, that's when the Russians turned against the west in a way that lead to Putin.

ALL LIES. I think you mean to say she was glad to have convinced Bill to intervene. That's not "warmongering," that intervention. We can debate whether or not intervention was the correct thing to do, but it's telling that Republicans (and that's what you sound like) have to lie to make a point.