Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Both my husband and I have experienced this to one degree or another. I was making a great salary, but had no work life balance. I gave that up and moved to a career in which I have less prestige, but more quality time with my child. My husband has had the opportunity to advance in his current employer (he has been there 20plus years) to a position that would significantly increase his pay, but would require a great deal of travel (2plus weeks per month). He has declined because he doesn't want to spend time away from home. We could easily swing it as I work from home and have lots of flexibility with my position. My child is in daycare/pre-school - but no additional childcare other than that. Spending quality time with our child is important to us and we place a premium on it.
It sounds like you coworker is sacrificing time with her child for her career. She pays for extra childcare so it sounds like she has little quality time with her kid.
IMO, I think you got the better deal. Sure, you may not have gotten the promotion, but you have a manageable work/life balance in which you don't need a ton of extra childcare. Promotions will come and go - the quality time with your kids is way more special than any promotion.
I made these choices and hit all the milestones; until my mid 50s. Then you're either in the executive suite or out. I got laid off, like most
Ugh. Why would you assume that the coworker is sacrificing time with her child for her career? Maybe she has figured out a balance that OP hasn't. No need to criticize the coworker just to make the OP feel better or help her to justify her own career decisions.
I was actually pulling that from the OP's post -My colleague definitely puts more into her work than I do (not raw hours, but is willing to travel several times per month and with little notice, needs fewer sick days for her child, pays for lots of extra childcare),
Willing to travel SEVERAL TIMES PER MONTH = (time away from child)
Pays for LOTS of extra childcare = additional time away from child
I am a working mom. I am not casting judgment. Some people have different priorities. It doesn't make them right or wrong.
), it's the sense of falling behind, and seeing the consequences of my choices play out.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Both my husband and I have experienced this to one degree or another. I was making a great salary, but had no work life balance. I gave that up and moved to a career in which I have less prestige, but more quality time with my child. My husband has had the opportunity to advance in his current employer (he has been there 20plus years) to a position that would significantly increase his pay, but would require a great deal of travel (2plus weeks per month). He has declined because he doesn't want to spend time away from home. We could easily swing it as I work from home and have lots of flexibility with my position. My child is in daycare/pre-school - but no additional childcare other than that. Spending quality time with our child is important to us and we place a premium on it.
It sounds like you coworker is sacrificing time with her child for her career. She pays for extra childcare so it sounds like she has little quality time with her kid.
IMO, I think you got the better deal. Sure, you may not have gotten the promotion, but you have a manageable work/life balance in which you don't need a ton of extra childcare. Promotions will come and go - the quality time with your kids is way more special than any promotion.
Ugh. Why would you assume that the coworker is sacrificing time with her child for her career? Maybe she has figured out a balance that OP hasn't. No need to criticize the coworker just to make the OP feel better or help her to justify her own career decisions.
Seriously. Do you know the coworker? Stop bashing other women's career choices because they decide to do something other than aspire to be a SAHM.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I get out op, and I don't think it's about money, like some pps were assuming.
I think that the women on the other side, who leaned in career wise and had to make sacrifices on family time also sometimes wonder "what if..." It's totally natural. If you haven't already, read Anne Marie slaughter's piece on this in the Atlantic. Can women (or anyone) have it all, really?
NO, because those women still have the option to become SAH, get fertility treatments, adopt, foster, etc. Once you're out of the workforce for a while, you've missed your boat. But I'm sure it's aaaalll worth it, right?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Both my husband and I have experienced this to one degree or another. I was making a great salary, but had no work life balance. I gave that up and moved to a career in which I have less prestige, but more quality time with my child. My husband has had the opportunity to advance in his current employer (he has been there 20plus years) to a position that would significantly increase his pay, but would require a great deal of travel (2plus weeks per month). He has declined because he doesn't want to spend time away from home. We could easily swing it as I work from home and have lots of flexibility with my position. My child is in daycare/pre-school - but no additional childcare other than that. Spending quality time with our child is important to us and we place a premium on it.
It sounds like you coworker is sacrificing time with her child for her career. She pays for extra childcare so it sounds like she has little quality time with her kid.
IMO, I think you got the better deal. Sure, you may not have gotten the promotion, but you have a manageable work/life balance in which you don't need a ton of extra childcare. Promotions will come and go - the quality time with your kids is way more special than any promotion.
Ugh. Why would you assume that the coworker is sacrificing time with her child for her career? Maybe she has figured out a balance that OP hasn't. No need to criticize the coworker just to make the OP feel better or help her to justify her own career decisions.
Anonymous wrote:I get out op, and I don't think it's about money, like some pps were assuming.
I think that the women on the other side, who leaned in career wise and had to make sacrifices on family time also sometimes wonder "what if..." It's totally natural. If you haven't already, read Anne Marie slaughter's piece on this in the Atlantic. Can women (or anyone) have it all, really?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Both my husband and I have experienced this to one degree or another. I was making a great salary, but had no work life balance. I gave that up and moved to a career in which I have less prestige, but more quality time with my child. My husband has had the opportunity to advance in his current employer (he has been there 20plus years) to a position that would significantly increase his pay, but would require a great deal of travel (2plus weeks per month). He has declined because he doesn't want to spend time away from home. We could easily swing it as I work from home and have lots of flexibility with my position. My child is in daycare/pre-school - but no additional childcare other than that. Spending quality time with our child is important to us and we place a premium on it.
It sounds like you coworker is sacrificing time with her child for her career. She pays for extra childcare so it sounds like she has little quality time with her kid.
IMO, I think you got the better deal. Sure, you may not have gotten the promotion, but you have a manageable work/life balance in which you don't need a ton of extra childcare. Promotions will come and go - the quality time with your kids is way more special than any promotion.
Ugh. Why would you assume that the coworker is sacrificing time with her child for her career? Maybe she has figured out a balance that OP hasn't. No need to criticize the coworker just to make the OP feel better or help her to justify her own career decisions.
My colleague definitely puts more into her work than I do (not raw hours, but is willing to travel several times per month and with little notice, needs fewer sick days for her child, pays for lots of extra childcare),
Anonymous wrote:Both my husband and I have experienced this to one degree or another. I was making a great salary, but had no work life balance. I gave that up and moved to a career in which I have less prestige, but more quality time with my child. My husband has had the opportunity to advance in his current employer (he has been there 20plus years) to a position that would significantly increase his pay, but would require a great deal of travel (2plus weeks per month). He has declined because he doesn't want to spend time away from home. We could easily swing it as I work from home and have lots of flexibility with my position. My child is in daycare/pre-school - but no additional childcare other than that. Spending quality time with our child is important to us and we place a premium on it.
It sounds like you coworker is sacrificing time with her child for her career. She pays for extra childcare so it sounds like she has little quality time with her kid.
IMO, I think you got the better deal. Sure, you may not have gotten the promotion, but you have a manageable work/life balance in which you don't need a ton of extra childcare. Promotions will come and go - the quality time with your kids is way more special than any promotion.