Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:http://www.npr.org/2017/01/13/509670980/trump-team-top-adviser-talked-with-russian-ambassador-before-u-s-hacking-respons
"The man tapped to be national security adviser to President-elect Trump, Gen. Michael Flynn, exchanged text messages and spoke with Russia's ambassador to the U.S. Sergey Kislyak in December around the time of the Obama administration's response to Russian interference during the presidential campaign, a spokesman for President-elect Donald Trump acknowledged Friday."
Is this treasonous? What the heck is wrong with us? When will the rest of the country wake up?
Ugh, this just gets worse and worse. Where is law enforcement? Where are the intelligence agencies? Where is the enforcement of our friggin' LAWS????????
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:http://www.npr.org/2017/01/13/509670980/trump-team-top-adviser-talked-with-russian-ambassador-before-u-s-hacking-respons
"The man tapped to be national security adviser to President-elect Trump, Gen. Michael Flynn, exchanged text messages and spoke with Russia's ambassador to the U.S. Sergey Kislyak in December around the time of the Obama administration's response to Russian interference during the presidential campaign, a spokesman for President-elect Donald Trump acknowledged Friday."
Is this treasonous? What the heck is wrong with us? When will the rest of the country wake up?
1. Flynn knew nothing about obamas little tizzy fit because the spying thing wasn't catching on and 2. This was well before the sanctions were implemented. Educate your stupid paranoid self.
Anonymous wrote:http://www.npr.org/2017/01/13/509670980/trump-team-top-adviser-talked-with-russian-ambassador-before-u-s-hacking-respons
"The man tapped to be national security adviser to President-elect Trump, Gen. Michael Flynn, exchanged text messages and spoke with Russia's ambassador to the U.S. Sergey Kislyak in December around the time of the Obama administration's response to Russian interference during the presidential campaign, a spokesman for President-elect Donald Trump acknowledged Friday."
Is this treasonous? What the heck is wrong with us? When will the rest of the country wake up?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So is anyone with any authority going to do anything about this? Are we okay with our president and his immediate advisors betraying our country to Russia for their personal gain and power? And in Trump's case, potentially enrichment?
How about you tell us what the attempt at influence was first? Watching everyone have a seizure every time "Russia" and anything to do with "Trump" comes up doesn't count.
And let's be honest: the publicly released hacking stuff is total joke.
Glad you're so cavalier about to-be advisors to a president potentially tipping off and/or colluding with Russians. Did you feel so cavalier about Hillary's emails? Or were you frothing at the mouth? Bet it was the latter. Hypocrite.
In a country that lives by "innocent until proven guilty", the whole rush to de-legitimize and charge with colluding with Russians should probably have some pretty serious evidence accompanying it.
You clowns are the cavalier ones, not those of us who have read the reports of 'manipulation' and laughed our asses off. Russia using RT to undermine by democracy by reporting on the enviro dangers of fracking? LOL!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So is anyone with any authority going to do anything about this? Are we okay with our president and his immediate advisors betraying our country to Russia for their personal gain and power? And in Trump's case, potentially enrichment?
How about you tell us what the attempt at influence was first? Watching everyone have a seizure every time "Russia" and anything to do with "Trump" comes up doesn't count.
And let's be honest: the publicly released hacking stuff is total joke.
Glad you're so cavalier about to-be advisors to a president potentially tipping off and/or colluding with Russians. Did you feel so cavalier about Hillary's emails? Or were you frothing at the mouth? Bet it was the latter. Hypocrite.
In a country that lives by "innocent until proven guilty", the whole rush to de-legitimize and charge with colluding with Russians should probably have some pretty serious evidence accompanying it.
You clowns are the cavalier ones, not those of us who have read the reports of 'manipulation' and laughed our asses off. Russia using RT to undermine by democracy by reporting on the enviro dangers of fracking? LOL!
Anonymous wrote:Us was placing sanctions on Russia for hacking. Evidence suggests Comey called to assure them not to worry because Trump would immediately lift all sanctions.
I think you meant Flynn
Actually, that is not true, in any case. Ignatious updated his column on this. Turns out that there were two phone calls with the Russian ambassador. Both prior to the sanctions. Both were condolence calls.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So is anyone with any authority going to do anything about this? Are we okay with our president and his immediate advisors betraying our country to Russia for their personal gain and power? And in Trump's case, potentially enrichment?
How about you tell us what the attempt at influence was first? Watching everyone have a seizure every time "Russia" and anything to do with "Trump" comes up doesn't count.
And let's be honest: the publicly released hacking stuff is total joke.
Glad you're so cavalier about to-be advisors to a president potentially tipping off and/or colluding with Russians. Did you feel so cavalier about Hillary's emails? Or were you frothing at the mouth? Bet it was the latter. Hypocrite.
Us was placing sanctions on Russia for hacking. Evidence suggests Comey called to assure them not to worry because Trump would immediately lift all sanctions.
I think you meant Flynn
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So where is the law enforcement of this? Is it up to the FBI, DNI, CIA? Is there someone guarding our rights or is this just going to be BAU for the next four years?
Until I see proof otherwise I'm convinced Comey was in on it. So yeah not looking good for oversight.
I agree. Absolutely.
Democrats seem to feel the same. There's lots of reference to a final 15 minutes in Comeys briefing "shaking confidence."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So is anyone with any authority going to do anything about this? Are we okay with our president and his immediate advisors betraying our country to Russia for their personal gain and power? And in Trump's case, potentially enrichment?
How about you tell us what the attempt at influence was first? Watching everyone have a seizure every time "Russia" and anything to do with "Trump" comes up doesn't count.
And let's be honest: the publicly released hacking stuff is total joke.
Anonymous wrote:So is anyone with any authority going to do anything about this? Are we okay with our president and his immediate advisors betraying our country to Russia for their personal gain and power? And in Trump's case, potentially enrichment?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't get the title of this thread. US was readying for hacking?what?!
Us was placing sanctions on Russia for hacking. Evidence suggests Comey called to assure them not to worry because Trump would immediately lift all sanctions.
I think you meant Flynn
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't get the title of this thread. US was readying for hacking?what?!
Us was placing sanctions on Russia for hacking. Evidence suggests Comey called to assure them not to worry because Trump would immediately lift all sanctions.