Anonymous wrote:No comment from Trump team until they figure out how to spin it or deflect.

Cue spinmeister Kellyanne Conway

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So will we ever get the details, or will they be released to the Ryan Presidential library in 2020?

FIFY

This Administration is not legitimate. Ryan should be sworn in and none of these cabinet picks should be codified. None.

Ryan!? F*ck that guy

Can't be Trump or Pence. They are illegitimate. Ryan is next in line as Speaker of the House.

I'm gonna posit he's part of
This corrupt administration and has to go too

NEXT

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So will we ever get the details, or will they be released to the Ryan Presidential library in 2020?

FIFY

This Administration is not legitimate. Ryan should be sworn in and none of these cabinet picks should be codified. None.

Ryan!? F*ck that guy

+1

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So will we ever get the details, or will they be released to the Ryan Presidential library in 2020?

FIFY

This Administration is not legitimate. Ryan should be sworn in and none of these cabinet picks should be codified. None.

Ryan!? F*ck that guy

Can't be Trump or Pence. They are illegitimate. Ryan is next in line as Speaker of the House.

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe I am missing something but this excerpt from the link seems to suggest the information was already available:

CNN has reviewed a 35-page compilation of the memos, from which the two-page synopsis was drawn. The memos originated as opposition research, first commissioned by anti-Trump Republicans, and later by Democrats.

From this article:

http://www.cnn.com/2017/01/10/politics/donald-trump-intelligence-report-russia/index.html

Some of the memos were circulating as far back as last summer. What has changed since then is that US intelligence agencies have now checked out the former British intelligence operative and his vast network throughout Europe and find him and his sources to be credible enough to include some of the information in the presentations to the President and President-elect a few days ago.

Help me out: is the suggestion that the Russians have found additional information over and beyond what opposition research surfaced?

My understanding is that we don't know exactly what the Russians have and, in fact, they might not have anything. What was discovered were claims by the Russians to have compromising information as well as contacts between the Trump campaign and the Russians. Again, as I understand it, a former British spy gathered the information. There is no new information. What is new is that US intelligence agencies have vetted the former British spy and found that his information is likely believable.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So will we ever get the details, or will they be released to the Ryan Presidential library in 2020?

FIFY

This Administration is not legitimate. Ryan should be sworn in and none of these cabinet picks should be codified. None.

Ryan!? F*ck that guy

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe I am missing something but this excerpt from the link seems to suggest the information was already available:

CNN has reviewed a 35-page compilation of the memos, from which the two-page synopsis was drawn. The memos originated as opposition research, first commissioned by anti-Trump Republicans, and later by Democrats.

From this article:

http://www.cnn.com/2017/01/10/politics/donald-trump-intelligence-report-russia/index.html

Some of the memos were circulating as far back as last summer. What has changed since then is that US intelligence agencies have now checked out the former British intelligence operative and his vast network throughout Europe and find him and his sources to be credible enough to include some of the information in the presentations to the President and President-elect a few days ago.

Help me out: is the suggestion that the Russians have found additional information over and beyond what opposition research surfaced?

Mother Jones reported on this in August and again in October. Harry Reid alluded to it before the election and his colleagues and those on the other side of the aisle (McConnell) failed to stand up for America.

Providing taxes is a presidential norm. THIS IS WHY.

At this juncture, I would submit that this administration is not legitimate. It has been compromised. The cabinet appointments should be held. Obviously this won't happen. but people like Bannon and Kushner simply shouldn't have access to Classified information much less nuclear codes.

We have a major constitutional crisis and it will be up to the GOP senators to get through it as quickly as possible.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe I am missing something but this excerpt from the link seems to suggest the information was already available:

CNN has reviewed a 35-page compilation of the memos, from which the two-page synopsis was drawn. The memos originated as opposition research, first commissioned by anti-Trump Republicans, and later by Democrats.

Available but not corroborated enough to make it public. Now it's been corroborated by UK Intelligence.

Yes, but it appears that the information was compiled by anti-Trump Republicans and Democrats.

Anonymous wrote:Maybe I am missing something but this excerpt from the link seems to suggest the information was already available:

CNN has reviewed a 35-page compilation of the memos, from which the two-page synopsis was drawn. The memos originated as opposition research, first commissioned by anti-Trump Republicans, and later by Democrats.

From this article:

http://www.cnn.com/2017/01/10/politics/donald-trump-intelligence-report-russia/index.html

Some of the memos were circulating as far back as last summer. What has changed since then is that US intelligence agencies have now checked out the former British intelligence operative and his vast network throughout Europe and find him and his sources to be credible enough to include some of the information in the presentations to the President and President-elect a few days ago.

Anonymous wrote:Maybe I am missing something but this excerpt from the link seems to suggest the information was already available:

CNN has reviewed a 35-page compilation of the memos, from which the two-page synopsis was drawn. The memos originated as opposition research, first commissioned by anti-Trump Republicans, and later by Democrats.

Available but not corroborated enough to make it public. Now it's been corroborated by UK Intelligence.

Maybe I am missing something but this excerpt from the link seems to suggest the information was already available:

CNN has reviewed a 35-page compilation of the memos, from which the two-page synopsis was drawn. The memos originated as opposition research, first commissioned by anti-Trump Republicans, and later by Democrats.

Anonymous wrote:So will we ever get the details, or will they be released to the Ryan Presidential library in 2020?

FIFY

This Administration is not legitimate. Ryan should be sworn in and none of these cabinet picks should be codified. None.

This seems like a big F-ing deal.

Watergate=getting illegal intel on the DNC

These allegations=getting illegal intel on the DNC

Except this time in collusion w/ foreign power