Anonymous wrote:The defense budget is also a public works project now. Where would all those folks work? Duh!
Anonymous wrote:If you read the Post article, the concern isn't just that the % of total budget spent for support is so high, the concern is that the Pentagon hired outside experts for an assessment and recommendations on saving money, expecting to find maybe $500 million possible savings. The results came back $1.25 billion possible savings, and the Pentagon suppressed the report because they weren't willing to risk having Congress cut their budget. What is concerning is that, having asked for data the Pentagon then shoved it in a desk rather than risk having it see the light of day.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can you think of smother large company that has similar recruiting, retention, development, maintenance and logistical challenges?
Yes I can. All of the defense contractors that we pay to do this work. None of which will have anywhere close to that much in administrative costs.
Anonymous wrote:If you read the Post article, the concern isn't just that the % of total budget spent for support is so high, the concern is that the Pentagon hired outside experts for an assessment and recommendations on saving money, expecting to find maybe $500 million possible savings. The results came back $125 billion possible savings, and the Pentagon suppressed the report because they weren't willing to risk having Congress cut their budget. What is concerning is that, having asked for data the Pentagon then shoved it in a desk rather than risk having it see the light of day.
Anonymous wrote:In the article is says the average salary is everyone is $180k-200k. Wtf, how are all these people making more than congressmen?
Anonymous wrote:Can you think of smother large company that has similar recruiting, retention, development, maintenance and logistical challenges?