Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here's a list of college commitments from the National league website: http://www.usyouthsoccer.org/national_league/national_league_college_commitments/
Combining U18 & U19 boys that is about 68 commitments for up to 1200 league players for about a 5% commitment rate. While not official numbers and certainly great schools are represented there is nothing there that would convince me that ODP would not help a player stand out.
So what are the stats for ODP college commitments? It seems like it could be useful in areas that don't have a lot of soccer options, but not sure what it adds around here where there are large numbers of high level teams and coaching available.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here's a list of college commitments from the National league website: http://www.usyouthsoccer.org/national_league/national_league_college_commitments/
Combining U18 & U19 boys that is about 68 commitments for up to 1200 league players for about a 5% commitment rate. While not official numbers and certainly great schools are represented there is nothing there that would convince me that ODP would not help a player stand out.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here's a list of college commitments from the National league website: http://www.usyouthsoccer.org/national_league/national_league_college_commitments/
Combining U18 & U19 boys that is about 68 commitments for up to 1200 league players for about a 5% commitment rate. While not official numbers and certainly great schools are represented there is nothing there that would convince me that ODP would not help a player stand out.
Anonymous wrote:Here's a list of college commitments from the National league website: http://www.usyouthsoccer.org/national_league/national_league_college_commitments/
Anonymous wrote:^^No need to apologize. We will have to agree to disagree about how helpful iODP is in this day and age is for recruiting purposes, but I'm glad to hear that some find it worthwhile.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
if you aren't in da by age 14 or at the latest 15 in this day and age, you 80% won't be playing d1. a strong endurance athlete with ok ability can get recruited by nescac or centennial league without being in da and showing up to college camps run in junior year summer (how my siblings got 'found' by schools like williams, swarthmore, haverford, etc).
Curious about the 80% figure. Our DS is starter on a highly competitive team (National League, highly ranked on GotSoccer.com, etc) and is wondering how critical it is to make a DA team to get recruited to D1. Several players on his current team have played on DAs (and had poor experiences) or were made offers by a DA but declined.
You could look into ODP as a supplement and beyond that target schools and attend their ID camps.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
if you aren't in da by age 14 or at the latest 15 in this day and age, you 80% won't be playing d1. a strong endurance athlete with ok ability can get recruited by nescac or centennial league without being in da and showing up to college camps run in junior year summer (how my siblings got 'found' by schools like williams, swarthmore, haverford, etc).
Curious about the 80% figure. Our DS is starter on a highly competitive team (National League, highly ranked on GotSoccer.com, etc) and is wondering how critical it is to make a DA team to get recruited to D1. Several players on his current team have played on DAs (and had poor experiences) or were made offers by a DA but declined.
Anonymous wrote:
if you aren't in da by age 14 or at the latest 15 in this day and age, you 80% won't be playing d1. a strong endurance athlete with ok ability can get recruited by nescac or centennial league without being in da and showing up to college camps run in junior year summer (how my siblings got 'found' by schools like williams, swarthmore, haverford, etc).
Anonymous wrote:There are around 39,000 who play men's soccer at all colleges - and 38,000 for women.
There's a range of levels of play at colleges - and even among the DIII and liberal arts schools, some have more competitive soccer programs than others.
Basically, what you seem to really be asking is if you can tell by age 12 if it's worth and how much effort to invest in having your kid play competitively now and even through high school/club level age -- which would be the first steps in the goal of potentially having a kid play in college. These day, the typical path is to try to play on as competitive a club level team as possible. Some high school programs tho are stronger than others and some kids can thrive in different environments. But there is generally a gap in the coaching and level of play b/w high school and the various club levels up through the DA levels. But it is generalities. There are lots of kids who play on HS teams in the DMV who end up playing at DIII and SLAC or other liberal arts schools. And within the college leagues, at DIII and the liberal arts schools - there is a spectrum of stronger to weaker teams.
But overall advice would be to keep a goal of playing in college in the back of your mind when a kid is 12 - and at this age, if there is interest & seeming potential, just try to get them into the best match for good coaching/training/temperament for your kid to thrive now.
http://scholarshipstats.com/soccer.html
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ignore it as a way in to college, or the way to pay for college. Please.
no - don't listen to this OP. esp if you are asian or unhooked kid. My siblings were all a decade younger than me and we pushed them in soccer as a way to get a hook that otherwise wouldn't have nabbed them acceptance to 'top schools'. i.e. your typical 2100/2150, top 10% student that gets shut out of ivies or top slacs because they are non-urm and un-hooked.
Yeah, it can help you get in, but you still have to have great academic stats for those schools. (A superstar can probably get into an Ivy with less-than-great academics but each team will probably have a few.)
pp you are responding to - perhaps we have different criteria for what is 'great academic stats' but i don't consider 2100-2200 sat/top 10% student in middle class flyover public to be great academic stats. however that was above the median for the soccer teams my siblings played in at their ivies and slac.
there are tens of thousands of students nationwide with those stats. while the ivies use the academic index, it dips pretty low IMO for athletes. but then again it depends what you define as great or not.
great for me is 2250+/top 2-5% class ranked kid at a competitive HS.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ignore it as a way in to college, or the way to pay for college. Please.
no - don't listen to this OP. esp if you are asian or unhooked kid. My siblings were all a decade younger than me and we pushed them in soccer as a way to get a hook that otherwise wouldn't have nabbed them acceptance to 'top schools'. i.e. your typical 2100/2150, top 10% student that gets shut out of ivies or top slacs because they are non-urm and un-hooked.
Yeah, it can help you get in, but you still have to have great academic stats for those schools. (A superstar can probably get into an Ivy with less-than-great academics but each team will probably have a few.)