Anonymous wrote:OP, Thanks to all that responded ( even those that were rudely critical of my personality and parenting), I asked because it has been on my mind since drop-off.
I had no plans of speaking with the teacher or her supervisor so you all can relax.
Anonymous wrote:What I dislike about what she said is that she assumes his attraction to girls, and assumes a 3 yr old would have an attraction to anyone at all.
What I dislike about what you said in response is that you were not respecting your son's body language to you, that he didn't want physical affection.
Anonymous wrote:What I dislike about what she said is that she assumes his attraction to girls, and assumes a 3 yr old would have an attraction to anyone at all.
What I dislike about what you said in response is that you were not respecting your son's body language to you, that he didn't want physical affection.
Anonymous wrote:What I dislike about what she said is that she assumes his attraction to girls, and assumes a 3 yr old would have an attraction to anyone at all.
What I dislike about what you said in response is that you were not respecting your son's body language to you, that he didn't want physical affection.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Aww she was probably just trying to be funny and you don't share her sense of humor. Don't worry.
This. She was trying to make light of the fact that you weren't getting a reciprocal kiss. NBD
Anonymous wrote:Neither OP nor the teacher said the right thing.
Anonymous wrote:Not only are you misinterpreting what was obviously a joke, but you assigned malicious intent and responded in a bizarre fashion which could have legitimately be interpreted as obnoxious.
Lighten up, Lady.
And how do you expect to teach your son "no means no" when you routinely force him to kiss you? Befuddling.
Anonymous wrote:This makes me scared to ever be a teacher.
It was a joke. Chill.