Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, if you are going to win the midwestern electoral votes, you will need to find someone who can work with them.
http://www.weeklystandard.com/the-election-came-down-to-107330-votes-in-pennsylvania-wisconsin-and-michigan/article/2005323
But in 2012, black voters made up 13 percent of the electorate; in 2016, they comprised just 10 percent of the electorate.
In terms of raw votes, that means roughly 130,000 fewer African-Americans voted in Pennsylvania in 2016 than voted in 2012. If those voters had shown up on Tuesday, that alone would've been enough for Clinton to hold Pennsylvania by a razor-thin margin.
Michigan and PA flip if black turnout was same as 2012.
if same as 2008, pa, michigan, and wisc all stay blue.
two things - 2020 nominee cannot be a non-black. and neither can dnc chair.
jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:I would love to see Ellison get the position and glad to see that Schumer is supporting him.
Jeff - ellison should NOT get it unless he agrees to step down from his seat in congress.
This is not a part time job.
DWS wasn't required to step down. If Ellison thinks he can do both jobs, he should be allowed.
jsteele wrote:I would love to see Ellison get the position and glad to see that Schumer is supporting him.
Anonymous wrote:Yes, if you are going to win the midwestern electoral votes, you will need to find someone who can work with them.
But in 2012, black voters made up 13 percent of the electorate; in 2016, they comprised just 10 percent of the electorate.
In terms of raw votes, that means roughly 130,000 fewer African-Americans voted in Pennsylvania in 2016 than voted in 2012. If those voters had shown up on Tuesday, that alone would've been enough for Clinton to hold Pennsylvania by a razor-thin margin.
Anonymous wrote:I know Mark Dayton left a bad aftertaste last time he was in Washington, but is very popular in the Upper Midwest.
Anonymous wrote:I know Barbara Boxer is older, but she is retiring, has years of experience, and is from CA.
Zephyr Teachout?
Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:I would love to see Ellison get the position and glad to see that Schumer is supporting him.
Jeff - ellison should NOT get it unless he agrees to step down from his seat in congress.
This is not a part time job.
DWS wasn't required to step down. If Ellison thinks he can do both jobs, he should be allowed.
yeah dws was a real success there - i expect better from you jeff
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:I would love to see Ellison get the position and glad to see that Schumer is supporting him.
Jeff -- a little off topic but what do you know about how Trump and Schumer get along
I can't tell you specifically anymore, but I lived in NYC and had a friend who's family was very well connected to NY politics. At that time, Schemer and Trump got a long VERY well. But no surprise for two reasons. Schemer gets along with everyone (he's a very nice personable guy) and everyone loved Trump.
Now? Who knows. Their relationship was one of political and practical convenience as much as anything, so if that value disintegrated . . . .
Anonymous wrote:Yes, I realize the other thread is on-going. I was intending a discussion about the future, not about why Hillary lost.
My point: There are dozens of bright Dems in Congress who are well-connected, well-funded, and reasonably down to earth. But with the Senate in such tight straits, someone who has the time and expertise to lead, and less of a personal interest needs to be there.
Could we please continue with ideas?