Anonymous wrote:In my lifetime, we have had the same shocked reaction to Reagan ( an actor) and GWB (various shortcomings). Hard to be surprised anymore about the whims of the electorate.
Anonymous wrote:Latinos and blacks needed to vote in bigger numbers.
Anonymous wrote:In my lifetime, we have had the same shocked reaction to Reagan ( an actor) and GWB (various shortcomings). Hard to be surprised anymore about the whims of the electorate.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Pollsters didn't really f up. It's the closeted trump supporters. Many are voting against her in protest and want change some are racist some just dumb. People didn't tell the truth when they were polled about who they would vote for.
Which is why polls are based on inaccurate assumptions that we really can't use in the future. Assuming you'll get the truth out of people is not good data, especially with the availability of other data to mine now. Pollsters would do well to get out of that business and into big data. Like yesterday.
Where does the data come from that's used in data mining?Anonymous wrote: Except when put a label to a group, you create an atmosphere of "us versus them" which contradicts your phrase that you want a united America.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:RIP America
46 million people respectfully disagree (and counting)
Respectfully? Mostly not.
I think you have us mixed up with liberals. We really do want a united America. Get over it and lets move on.
Anonymous wrote:Pollsters didn't really f up. It's the closeted trump supporters. Many are voting against her in protest and want change some are racist some just dumb. People didn't tell the truth when they were polled about who they would vote for.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:RIP America
46 million people respectfully disagree (and counting)
Respectfully? Mostly not.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Holy shit guys. I'm shocked. And I say this as a republican who hates trump. How is this happening?
Pollsters fucked up.