Anonymous
11/03/2016 18:54
Subject: Is the sitting POTUS supposed to be endorsing a candidate and campaigning on there behalf?
Two things bother me about this.
1. Are the taxpayers paying for Obama to fly all over the place in airfare 1? Airfare 1? Okay, Vladchenko. And to answer your question, yes. Just as we did when George W flew hither and yon during the midterms.
2. Us normal people only get 2 weeks vacation per year, are we paying the president's salary while he travels around and campaigns for Hillary or does he have to take leave without pay or is he using part of his 2 weeks vacation? Oh, dear. The president is never not working. Ever.
1. Are the taxpayers paying for Obama to fly all over the place in airfare 1? Airfare 1? Okay, Vladchenko. And to answer your question, yes. Just as we did when George W flew hither and yon during the midterms.
2. Us normal people only get 2 weeks vacation per year, are we paying the president's salary while he travels around and campaigns for Hillary or does he have to take leave without pay or is he using part of his 2 weeks vacation? Oh, dear. The president is never not working. Ever.
Anonymous
11/03/2016 18:49
Subject: Is the sitting POTUS supposed to be endorsing a candidate and campaigning on there behalf?
Two things bother me about this.
1. Are the taxpayers paying for Obama to fly all over the place in airfare 1?
2. Us normal people only get 2 weeks vacation per year, are we paying the president's salary while he travels around and campaigns for Hillary or does he have to take leave without pay or is he using part of his 2 weeks vacation?
1. Are the taxpayers paying for Obama to fly all over the place in airfare 1?
2. Us normal people only get 2 weeks vacation per year, are we paying the president's salary while he travels around and campaigns for Hillary or does he have to take leave without pay or is he using part of his 2 weeks vacation?
Anonymous
11/03/2016 18:30
Subject: Is the sitting POTUS supposed to be endorsing a candidate and campaigning on there behalf?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What planet have you been on till now, OP?
Probably West Virginia.
I'm not from the beautiful state of West Virginia. But why be ugly? I just don't understand it.
Don't be shocked. On this forum, many so-called liberal, all-inclusive posters think it's fine to denigrate certain states and groups of people.
That PP could also be a conservative, un-PC jag. On an anonymous website, best not to assume.
Anonymous
11/03/2016 18:21
Subject: Is the sitting POTUS supposed to be endorsing a candidate and campaigning on there behalf?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Gore didn't want Bill on the road for him and no one wanted GWB's endorsement, so the last time it really happened was in 1988 when Reagan endorsed Papa Bush.
Did he and Nancy actively campaign for Bush?
Yes! I was alive then and I remember it. It doesn't typically raise eyebrows as it is totally legal and ethical... and expected. PPs are right that it's just been so long, most folks don't remember
Anonymous
11/03/2016 18:02
Subject: Is the sitting POTUS supposed to be endorsing a candidate and campaigning on there behalf?
Anonymous wrote:Maybe they do things differently in Russia.
Yep. Things sure are different over their.
Anonymous
11/03/2016 17:19
Subject: Is the sitting POTUS supposed to be endorsing a candidate and campaigning on there behalf?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What planet have you been on till now, OP?
Probably West Virginia.
I'm not from the beautiful state of West Virginia. But why be ugly? I just don't understand it.
And you never will. They just jab and run.
Anonymous
11/03/2016 17:05
Subject: Is the sitting POTUS supposed to be endorsing a candidate and campaigning on there behalf?
Anonymous wrote:Gore didn't want Bill on the road for him and no one wanted GWB's endorsement, so the last time it really happened was in 1988 when Reagan endorsed Papa Bush.
Did he and Nancy actively campaign for Bush?
Anonymous
11/03/2016 17:04
Subject: Is the sitting POTUS supposed to be endorsing a candidate and campaigning on there behalf?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What planet have you been on till now, OP?
Probably West Virginia.
I'm not from the beautiful state of West Virginia. But why be ugly? I just don't understand it.
Don't be shocked. On this forum, many so-called liberal, all-inclusive posters think it's fine to denigrate certain states and groups of people.
Anonymous
11/03/2016 17:02
Subject: Is the sitting POTUS supposed to be endorsing a candidate and campaigning on there behalf?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:how long have you lived in this country?Anonymous wrote:It disturbs me to see how Obama has so much of a vested interest in endorsing Hillary. Shouldn't he remain neutral?
Answer: never!
It's "Fancy Bear" blogging for Trump.
Anonymous
11/03/2016 16:01
Subject: Is the sitting POTUS supposed to be endorsing a candidate and campaigning on there behalf?
Anonymous wrote:how long have you lived in this country?Anonymous wrote:It disturbs me to see how Obama has so much of a vested interest in endorsing Hillary. Shouldn't he remain neutral?
Answer: never!
Anonymous
11/03/2016 15:55
Subject: Is the sitting POTUS supposed to be endorsing a candidate and campaigning on there behalf?
how long have you lived in this country?Anonymous wrote:It disturbs me to see how Obama has so much of a vested interest in endorsing Hillary. Shouldn't he remain neutral?
Anonymous
11/03/2016 15:55
Subject: Re:Is the sitting POTUS supposed to be endorsing a candidate and campaigning on there behalf?
Perhaps you could consider that these "MOFOs" may be new to the process. There's no need to be so snarky.
Anonymous
11/03/2016 15:54
Subject: Is the sitting POTUS supposed to be endorsing a candidate and campaigning on there behalf?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It disturbs me to see how Obama has so much of a vested interest in endorsing Hillary. Shouldn't he remain neutral?
If you ask Harry Reid, it's a violation of Hatch Act.
You're very ignorant. The Hatch Act doesn't apply to Congress or the president, vice president, and certain other high-level officials in the Executive Branch. It DOES apply to Comey.
Anonymous
11/03/2016 15:54
Subject: Is the sitting POTUS supposed to be endorsing a candidate and campaigning on there behalf?
Gore didn't want Bill on the road for him and no one wanted GWB's endorsement, so the last time it really happened was in 1988 when Reagan endorsed Papa Bush.
Anonymous
11/03/2016 15:53
Subject: Is the sitting POTUS supposed to be endorsing a candidate and campaigning on there behalf?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What planet have you been on till now, OP?
These MOFO's act like they are new to the game!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Hey, be nice!
Most of Trump's Russian troll supporters don't really understand U.S. election politics!
HAHAHAHHAHA