Anonymous
Post 11/03/2016 09:47     Subject: Re:Turning off the lights at the FBI
What do Dems want Comey to do? Lie to the congress like Hillary?

He must notify congress because he told them previously the investigation was closed. Is telling the truth a sin now?

Why is Obama campaigning on taxpayers' dollars and time not a violation of Hatch Act?
Anonymous
Post 11/03/2016 09:46     Subject: Turning off the lights at the FBI
Oh, and the FBI docs are available in their online vault, as you seem to know. You should take a look at them if you're interested in facts.
Anonymous
Post 11/03/2016 09:42     Subject: Turning off the lights at the FBI
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:If Hillary wins, she should basically destroy the FBI as we know it. Not even Hoover would have interfered so brazenly in a presidential election (and tolerated leaks like this). Who would have thought that the October surprise would not be from Putin's FSB but rather from a rogue FBI?! The FBI culture needs a total re-boot, and the best way to do it is to break the agency up and transfer its various functions to more accountable agencies.



Sounds like you would have preferred that the rest of us not have knowledge of what was really going on with the Clintons, the DNC "behind the scenes" activities, etc. If not for the leaks, how would we know the truth?


We don't know any "truth," we know innuendo. And the leaks have been entirely one sided and totally meant to smear Clinton - why else would a dead FBI Twitter suddenly have Marc Rich papers? That was 16 years ago, the facts were known then. Sounds like you don't mind a partisan agency so long as it favors your version of the truth. Why don't we know more about Donald's dealings with Putin, because we know there are issues.


Dems didn't seem to mind Comey breaking SOP by announcing he wasn't recommending an indictment at that time.

Apparently that Twitter is based on FOIA requests. From what I've read, if they get 3 FOIA requests for the same thing, they post it online instead of mailing them. I'm not FBI, so I can't confirm that that's true, but that's what I heard. Or it's a rogue FBI agent pissed that DOJ tried to squash their investigation(s). Who knows.

The NYT already wrote about how the FBI hasnt found any direct connection between Trump and "the Russians."
Anonymous
Post 11/03/2016 09:35     Subject: Turning off the lights at the FBI
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:If Hillary wins, she should basically destroy the FBI as we know it. Not even Hoover would have interfered so brazenly in a presidential election (and tolerated leaks like this). Who would have thought that the October surprise would not be from Putin's FSB but rather from a rogue FBI?! The FBI culture needs a total re-boot, and the best way to do it is to break the agency up and transfer its various functions to more accountable agencies.



Sounds like you would have preferred that the rest of us not have knowledge of what was really going on with the Clintons, the DNC "behind the scenes" activities, etc. If not for the leaks, how would we know the truth?


We don't know any "truth," we know innuendo. And the leaks have been entirely one sided and totally meant to smear Clinton - why else would a dead FBI Twitter suddenly have Marc Rich papers? That was 16 years ago, the facts were known then. Sounds like you don't mind a partisan agency so long as it favors your version of the truth. Why don't we know more about Donald's dealings with Putin, because we know there are issues.
Anonymous
Post 11/03/2016 09:03     Subject: Turning off the lights at the FBI
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:If Hillary wins, she should basically destroy the FBI as we know it. Not even Hoover would have interfered so brazenly in a presidential election (and tolerated leaks like this). Who would have thought that the October surprise would not be from Putin's FSB but rather from a rogue FBI?! The FBI culture needs a total re-boot, and the best way to do it is to break the agency up and transfer its various functions to more accountable agencies.



Sounds like you would have preferred that the rest of us not have knowledge of what was really going on with the Clintons, the DNC "behind the scenes" activities, etc. If not for the leaks, how would we know the truth?


Admit it, it doesn't matter who won, you hate anyone running as a Democrat.


I'm not PP. As an R, I would've voted for Biden if he ran. Never Hillary.


I'm the PP, and I would have voted for Biden as well. Although I'm pretty conservative, I might even have voted for Bernie because I admire his passion and sincerity!

Same here.
Anonymous
Post 11/03/2016 08:21     Subject: Turning off the lights at the FBI
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:If Hillary wins, she should basically destroy the FBI as we know it. Not even Hoover would have interfered so brazenly in a presidential election (and tolerated leaks like this). Who would have thought that the October surprise would not be from Putin's FSB but rather from a rogue FBI?! The FBI culture needs a total re-boot, and the best way to do it is to break the agency up and transfer its various functions to more accountable agencies.



Sounds like you would have preferred that the rest of us not have knowledge of what was really going on with the Clintons, the DNC "behind the scenes" activities, etc. If not for the leaks, how would we know the truth?


Admit it, it doesn't matter who won, you hate anyone running as a Democrat.


I'm not PP. As an R, I would've voted for Biden if he ran. Never Hillary.


I'm the PP, and I would have voted for Biden as well. Although I'm pretty conservative, I might even have voted for Bernie because I admire his passion and sincerity!
Anonymous
Post 11/03/2016 08:19     Subject: Turning off the lights at the FBI
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:If Hillary wins, she should basically destroy the FBI as we know it. Not even Hoover would have interfered so brazenly in a presidential election (and tolerated leaks like this). Who would have thought that the October surprise would not be from Putin's FSB but rather from a rogue FBI?! The FBI culture needs a total re-boot, and the best way to do it is to break the agency up and transfer its various functions to more accountable agencies.



Sounds like you would have preferred that the rest of us not have knowledge of what was really going on with the Clintons, the DNC "behind the scenes" activities, etc. If not for the leaks, how would we know the truth?


Admit it, it doesn't matter who won, you hate anyone running as a Democrat.


You've got that wrong, sister! I just happen to disapprove of what's been happening within the DNC to tilt this election towards HRC, and I think that Hillary has been given a big ole pass re her dishonesty in many areas of her political career. I do admire her intelligence, tenacity, and all that she's done to raise a lovely daughter.
Anonymous
Post 11/03/2016 08:18     Subject: Turning off the lights at the FBI
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:If Hillary wins, she should basically destroy the FBI as we know it. Not even Hoover would have interfered so brazenly in a presidential election (and tolerated leaks like this). Who would have thought that the October surprise would not be from Putin's FSB but rather from a rogue FBI?! The FBI culture needs a total re-boot, and the best way to do it is to break the agency up and transfer its various functions to more accountable agencies.



Sounds like you would have preferred that the rest of us not have knowledge of what was really going on with the Clintons, the DNC "behind the scenes" activities, etc. If not for the leaks, how would we know the truth?


Admit it, it doesn't matter who won, you hate anyone running as a Democrat.


Not who you are responding to but in reading his posts, I'm not sure how you got there. He asked a good question; if not for the leaks, how would anyone know the truth of what is going on here? Is it more important that we know the truth (you know, transparency and all that talk spewed by Obama and Hillary) or how we got the truth?
Anonymous
Post 11/03/2016 08:17     Subject: Turning off the lights at the FBI
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:If Hillary wins, she should basically destroy the FBI as we know it. Not even Hoover would have interfered so brazenly in a presidential election (and tolerated leaks like this). Who would have thought that the October surprise would not be from Putin's FSB but rather from a rogue FBI?! The FBI culture needs a total re-boot, and the best way to do it is to break the agency up and transfer its various functions to more accountable agencies.



Sounds like you would have preferred that the rest of us not have knowledge of what was really going on with the Clintons, the DNC "behind the scenes" activities, etc. If not for the leaks, how would we know the truth?


Admit it, it doesn't matter who won, you hate anyone running as a Democrat.


I'm not PP. As an R, I would've voted for Biden if he ran. Never Hillary.
Anonymous
Post 11/03/2016 08:14     Subject: Turning off the lights at the FBI
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:If Hillary wins, she should basically destroy the FBI as we know it. Not even Hoover would have interfered so brazenly in a presidential election (and tolerated leaks like this). Who would have thought that the October surprise would not be from Putin's FSB but rather from a rogue FBI?! The FBI culture needs a total re-boot, and the best way to do it is to break the agency up and transfer its various functions to more accountable agencies.



Sounds like you would have preferred that the rest of us not have knowledge of what was really going on with the Clintons, the DNC "behind the scenes" activities, etc. If not for the leaks, how would we know the truth?


Admit it, it doesn't matter who won, you hate anyone running as a Democrat.
Anonymous
Post 11/03/2016 08:13     Subject: Turning off the lights at the FBI
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:ROFLMAO! A month ago the FBI was straight-shooting & non-partisan when it was ordered to stop investigating Clinton. Now, it needs to be broken up and is a centerpiece to partisan politics, because it gained a conscious and is completing what it should have doing the entire time.


BTW, Bernie supporters, do you agree with PP above who states the election is rigged against Clinton?

First, no. They weren't "ordered to stop," quit making shit up.
Second, no. Comey's little armchair chat pontificating about Hillary was also a partisan dick move.


Did you read last night's WSJ article about the DOJ and FBI feuding over the CF inv? I suggest you do.

This
Anonymous
Post 11/03/2016 08:13     Subject: Turning off the lights at the FBI
Anonymous wrote:If Hillary wins, she should basically destroy the FBI as we know it. Not even Hoover would have interfered so brazenly in a presidential election (and tolerated leaks like this). Who would have thought that the October surprise would not be from Putin's FSB but rather from a rogue FBI?! The FBI culture needs a total re-boot, and the best way to do it is to break the agency up and transfer its various functions to more accountable agencies.



Sounds like you would have preferred that the rest of us not have knowledge of what was really going on with the Clintons, the DNC "behind the scenes" activities, etc. If not for the leaks, how would we know the truth?
Anonymous
Post 11/03/2016 08:11     Subject: Turning off the lights at the FBI
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:ROFLMAO! A month ago the FBI was straight-shooting & non-partisan when it was ordered to stop investigating Clinton. Now, it needs to be broken up and is a centerpiece to partisan politics, because it gained a conscious and is completing what it should have doing the entire time.


BTW, Bernie supporters, do you agree with PP above who states the election is rigged against Clinton?


Oh really? A month ago the FBI was rigged against Trump according to Trump himself!

BTW, "we have too much debt" Republican economics voters, do you agree with cutting taxes bigly and doubling the debt from 20 to 40 trillion?


We can easily do that AND RAISE taxes by electing HRC! Doubling the debt is now a famous dem tactic. A "twofer" as it were.


Oh good let's just make up arguements now! I think the numbers people are wrong, Trump will leave us with 1 quadrillion dollars in debt! I can pull numbers out of thin air too!
Anonymous
Post 11/03/2016 08:10     Subject: Turning off the lights at the FBI
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:ROFLMAO! A month ago the FBI was straight-shooting & non-partisan when it was ordered to stop investigating Clinton. Now, it needs to be broken up and is a centerpiece to partisan politics, because it gained a conscious and is completing what it should have doing the entire time.


BTW, Bernie supporters, do you agree with PP above who states the election is rigged against Clinton?

First, no. They weren't "ordered to stop," quit making shit up.
Second, no. Comey's little armchair chat pontificating about Hillary was also a partisan dick move.


This
Anonymous
Post 11/03/2016 08:10     Subject: Turning off the lights at the FBI
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It seems very off that they made two releases so close to the election. The election is definitely rigged against Clinton. The FBI seems to be working with the alt-right media to cheat Clinton.

+1
They are also very clearly investigating at least three Russian cases between Trump and his campaign and Russia, an issue that is arguably more important, and nary a whisper.


It because there has already been releases showing there is NO connection. CBS and NY Times already reported this...wake up


False. "So far." They're being non-partisan and measured with Donald's cases. Just not Hillary's.