Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would say no, not when it becomes a kind of demand. Crucial to understanding consent is understanding that people's sexual urges may be different from yours- and if they don't want to have sex, you cannot try to coerce them into it.
I would say if you are in a relationship for the sole purpose of sex, or with that being a large part of it, then perhaps you need to rethink things.
Ok so if you are in a long-term relationship and your partner decides they don't want to have sex do you just accept that or do you try to solve the underlying cause.
Would you consider asking them to go to therapy coercion?
Is saying, "This isn't working for me; I don't know if I can stay in this relationship if sexual intimacy is not a part of it" considered coercion?
If you mean it, no. I would sooooooooo much much much rather see more posts on DCUM about people leaving someone because their sexual needs are that intense rather than trying to pressure (usually women) into having unwilling sex with them. It's so fucking regressive and sick. At least the other (lower libido) spouse has a chance of moving on to a healthy and understanding partner instead of being constantly pressured and having this messed up, traumatic sex life where they are essentially forced into sleeping with someone
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would say no, not when it becomes a kind of demand. Crucial to understanding consent is understanding that people's sexual urges may be different from yours- and if they don't want to have sex, you cannot try to coerce them into it.
I would say if you are in a relationship for the sole purpose of sex, or with that being a large part of it, then perhaps you need to rethink things.
Ok so if you are in a long-term relationship and your partner decides they don't want to have sex do you just accept that or do you try to solve the underlying cause.
Would you consider asking them to go to therapy coercion?
Is saying, "This isn't working for me; I don't know if I can stay in this relationship if sexual intimacy is not a part of it" considered coercion?
If you mean it, no. I would sooooooooo much much much rather see more posts on DCUM about people leaving someone because their sexual needs are that intense rather than trying to pressure (usually women) into having unwilling sex with them. It's so fucking regressive and sick. At least the other (lower libido) spouse has a chance of moving on to a healthy and understanding partner instead of being constantly pressured and having this messed up, traumatic sex life where they are essentially forced into sleeping with someone
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would say no, not when it becomes a kind of demand. Crucial to understanding consent is understanding that people's sexual urges may be different from yours- and if they don't want to have sex, you cannot try to coerce them into it.
I would say if you are in a relationship for the sole purpose of sex, or with that being a large part of it, then perhaps you need to rethink things.
Ok so if you are in a long-term relationship and your partner decides they don't want to have sex do you just accept that or do you try to solve the underlying cause.
Would you consider asking them to go to therapy coercion?
Is saying, "This isn't working for me; I don't know if I can stay in this relationship if sexual intimacy is not a part of it" considered coercion?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would say no, not when it becomes a kind of demand. Crucial to understanding consent is understanding that people's sexual urges may be different from yours- and if they don't want to have sex, you cannot try to coerce them into it.
I would say if you are in a relationship for the sole purpose of sex, or with that being a large part of it, then perhaps you need to rethink things.
Ok so if you are in a long-term relationship and your partner decides they don't want to have sex do you just accept that or do you try to solve the underlying cause.
Would you consider asking them to go to therapy coercion?
Anonymous wrote:A great sex life on a sustained basis is not possible without a great relationship.
In other words - first comes the relationship and then the sex. But later, they both feed each other.
In a marriage the sex and the great relationship need to go hand in hand, so that each is nourished and flourishing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm a single woman in my 30s, I expect no, I REQUIRE sex in my relationship because I enjoy it. I'm dumping a guy with a low sex drive. I really think low libido people should be dating each other only because they understand each other's lack of intimacy and are content with that lifestyle.
+1
Agreed. They do everyone a disservice by pretending to enjoy sex more than they really do in the beginning (this is how they even get into relationships with people with a more typical or high libido). They should just be themselves; they may have fewer relarionship options, but they'll have better matches for them and save everyone a lot of grief.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would say no, not when it becomes a kind of demand. Crucial to understanding consent is understanding that people's sexual urges may be different from yours- and if they don't want to have sex, you cannot try to coerce them into it.
I would say if you are in a relationship for the sole purpose of sex, or with that being a large part of it, then perhaps you need to rethink things.
Where are you getting coercion from? OP further clears things up in their second post. You can reasonably expect it to be colder in December than in June.
Whats the reaction going to be if it's colder in June?
So long as theres no bad reaction if/when that occurs- then sure, knock yourself out, I guess.
Any attempt to convince someone to "make it snow" in December rather than June (keeping with this inane metaphor) can in fact be classed as coercion. No bueno.
OP here.
Except I stated that force or coercion isn't what I'm asking, so your little tangent is off the mark, pp.
Anonymous wrote:
I believe it's part of the definition (for me).