Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^^ so all of that absolves Hillary?

We can only work with the evidence we have. This isn't about Trump, despite your efforts to make it so. If his e-mails/records/whatever are leaked (like his old taxes were, which was covered by the media), we'll discuss them then.

The allegations of wrongdoing that have come out of these leaks date back before the election even started. Clinton is in the pocket of many foreign governments, including several that she herself says support terrorist groups.

Receiving money from Saudi Arabia is not a per se bad thing. Sorry.

So what about accepting tens of millions of dollars from the Saudi king and overseeing massive arms deals to them as SoS while knowing (in her own words) that they were funding and supporting ISIS? That is a bad thing. Sorry.

Every American president has been involved with Saudis and sell arms to them. Remember bush was so friendly with the saudis even though all of the 9/11 perpetrators are saudi citizens and osama is a saudi himself. Guess who finally caught Osama, the same hillary and Obama you guys say are founders of ISIS.

Clinton foundation got many for charity from many people including saudi royalty. But the same Saudi royalty is not funding ISIS. Its like implicating all Americans as racists when few racist americans contribute money to KKK or Stormfront or other supremacists. What is common, because all are American citizens. Thats what you guys are saying. If some saudis are giving money to ISIS then all saudis are responsible for it.

Anonymous wrote:Regular voter here: Its sad to think that the corruption has gone so far that we have to rely on Wikileaks to have the truth published.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^^ so all of that absolves Hillary?

We can only work with the evidence we have. This isn't about Trump, despite your efforts to make it so. If his e-mails/records/whatever are leaked (like his old taxes were, which was covered by the media), we'll discuss them then.

The allegations of wrongdoing that have come out of these leaks date back before the election even started. Clinton is in the pocket of many foreign governments, including several that she herself says support terrorist groups.

Receiving money from Saudi Arabia is not a per se bad thing. Sorry.

So what about accepting tens of millions of dollars from the Saudi king and overseeing massive arms deals to them as SoS while knowing (in her own words) that they were funding and supporting ISIS? That is a bad thing. Sorry.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Remember people, the only republican value is power: attaining it and keeping it.

The only rule is "it's okay if you are a republican."

Once you realize this, everything becomes clear.

after the deflection and mental gymnastics on display by Hillary supporters + PP noting that this isn't about Dems v. Rep., it's about Hillary's before the election even BEGAN, that's your takeaway?

Anonymous wrote:Remember people, the only republican value is power: attaining it and keeping it.

The only rule is "it's okay if you are a republican."

Once you realize this, everything becomes clear.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^^ so all of that absolves Hillary?

We can only work with the evidence we have. This isn't about Trump, despite your efforts to make it so. If his e-mails/records/whatever are leaked (like his old taxes were, which was covered by the media), we'll discuss them then.

The allegations of wrongdoing that have come out of these leaks date back before the election even started. Clinton is in the pocket of many foreign governments, including several that she herself says support terrorist groups.

Receiving money from Saudi Arabia is not a per se bad thing. Sorry.

Anonymous wrote:^^ so all of that absolves Hillary?

We can only work with the evidence we have. This isn't about Trump, despite your efforts to make it so. If his e-mails/records/whatever are leaked (like his old taxes were, which was covered by the media), we'll discuss them then.

The allegations of wrongdoing that have come out of these leaks date back before the election even started. Clinton is in the pocket of many foreign governments, including several that she herself says support terrorist groups.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nobody cares, except Trump supporters.

In other words, "I do not give a damn about corruption and you cannot make me. It suits my needs not to care."

You sound proud of that stance. Vote for her, sure, but for God's sake, how can you not care about the deteriorated state our country is in that is allowing people to proudly state that they do not care about unethical behavior of its politicians?

Jesus, because you nutters don't care! These leaks come from Russia, and several of you on different threads here have said you don't care, we need to see the corruption! Well, then let's get started on the Republicans, who, may I remind you, have spent the last eight years doing NOTHING and have vowed to do more of the same. That's corruption you can weed out in your own party with a vote - no foreign influence needed! - but will you do it? Of course not. Cowards.

And why is it you think we should just skip over Hillary and focus on the Republicans first?

Because the Hillary stuff is fruit of the poisoned tree and we have Republican intransigence going on right now, for at least the last eight years. Why should we skip over that?

Hillary's running for the highest office in the land. To me, that makes investigating her corruption more important than the Republicans who have "done nothing over the last 8 years."

Has anyone come out and disauthenticated the e-mails? No? So, if we don't have reason to believe they've been modified, why should we focus on the source rather than the content? Has conclusive evidence come out that these leaks are from illegal hacking by the Russians? Nope, just "well this kinda looks like what they do so it might be them."

If a career criminal had evidence of a crime, should that evidence be ignored and not followed up on because of the source? You might look at the evidence a little more carefully due to the source, but it shouldn't be flat out ignored.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nobody cares, except Trump supporters.

Nobody cares about corruption? Are we a banana republic already? It figures...

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nobody cares, except Trump supporters.

In other words, "I do not give a damn about corruption and you cannot make me. It suits my needs not to care."

You sound proud of that stance. Vote for her, sure, but for God's sake, how can you not care about the deteriorated state our country is in that is allowing people to proudly state that they do not care about unethical behavior of its politicians?

Jesus, because you nutters don't care! These leaks come from Russia, and several of you on different threads here have said you don't care, we need to see the corruption! Well, then let's get started on the Republicans, who, may I remind you, have spent the last eight years doing NOTHING and have vowed to do more of the same. That's corruption you can weed out in your own party with a vote - no foreign influence needed! - but will you do it? Of course not. Cowards.

And why is it you think we should just skip over Hillary and focus on the Republicans first?

Because the Hillary stuff is fruit of the poisoned tree and we have Republican intransigence going on right now, for at least the last eight years. Why should we skip over that?

Dude. We've had a Democrat President for the last eight years. What on earth are you talking about?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nobody cares, except Trump supporters.

In other words, "I do not give a damn about corruption and you cannot make me. It suits my needs not to care."

You sound proud of that stance. Vote for her, sure, but for God's sake, how can you not care about the deteriorated state our country is in that is allowing people to proudly state that they do not care about unethical behavior of its politicians?

Jesus, because you nutters don't care! These leaks come from Russia, and several of you on different threads here have said you don't care, we need to see the corruption! Well, then let's get started on the Republicans, who, may I remind you, have spent the last eight years doing NOTHING and have vowed to do more of the same. That's corruption you can weed out in your own party with a vote - no foreign influence needed! - but will you do it? Of course not. Cowards.

And why is it you think we should just skip over Hillary and focus on the Republicans first?

Because the Hillary stuff is fruit of the poisoned tree and we have Republican intransigence going on right now, for at least the last eight years. Why should we skip over that?