Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Growing up there was no nurse at my school. Two of my kids are at parochial school and there is no nurse there. An office staff member administers a dose of medication if it is needed and logs it onto a chart. Teachers are trained to administer epi-pens. My third child is at a public school with a nurse. I would not be worried if there weren't a nurse there. They can call 911 if there is an emergency. I would rather they hire a reading intervention teacher instead.
Have you ever tried calling 911 in DC? You do realize the ambulance service will bill for any services they give you child?!?
Anonymous wrote:Growing up there was no nurse at my school. Two of my kids are at parochial school and there is no nurse there. An office staff member administers a dose of medication if it is needed and logs it onto a chart. Teachers are trained to administer epi-pens. My third child is at a public school with a nurse. I would not be worried if there weren't a nurse there. They can call 911 if there is an emergency. I would rather they hire a reading intervention teacher instead.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ugh - space requirements mandated by DOH
In the roundtable, Dr. Nesbitt said there's no space requirement anymore, but who knows whether that's the whole story. Maybe when she said there's no square footage requirement it's because there's now a square yard requirement.
Our charter was told it still exists. It also requires(d) a toilet area and running water.
Either that was before some rule was changed, or you were told something wrong. Here's the guidelines off the DOH website. Unless I missed one on square footage, it's about functional areas, not space necessarily.
http://doh.dc.gov/sites/default/files/dc/sites/doh/FAQs%20for%20DC%20School%20Health%20Nursing%20Program%202016.pdf
That does seem overly restrictive...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ugh - space requirements mandated by DOH
In the roundtable, Dr. Nesbitt said there's no space requirement anymore, but who knows whether that's the whole story. Maybe when she said there's no square footage requirement it's because there's now a square yard requirement.
Our charter was told it still exists. It also requires(d) a toilet area and running water.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ugh - space requirements mandated by DOH
In the roundtable, Dr. Nesbitt said there's no space requirement anymore, but who knows whether that's the whole story. Maybe when she said there's no square footage requirement it's because there's now a square yard requirement.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ugh - space requirements mandated by DOH
In the roundtable, Dr. Nesbitt said there's no space requirement anymore, but who knows whether that's the whole story. Maybe when she said there's no square footage requirement it's because there's now a square yard requirement.
Anonymous wrote:Ugh - space requirements mandated by DOH
Anonymous wrote:So what happens when e first kid has a peanut allergy and dies because the epicenter is locked up in the nurses office because there is no nurse? Is this funding cut cheaper than the lawsuit that will follow an incident like that?
JoshH wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Allen didn't stay for the whole meeting but while he was there he seemed to be the only one questioning the approach. Grosso asked a few hard questions but Nesbitt either didn't answer the questions at all or gave really flippant answers. I wonder who the groups are that will receive the "grants" and what existing connections those groups have to DOH.
Allen left early? Does he even pretend to care?
For what it's worth, Councilmember Allen gave opening remarks that hit the nail on the head for perspective as a parent. You should be able to find it on the video link if you're really interested.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Allen didn't stay for the whole meeting but while he was there he seemed to be the only one questioning the approach. Grosso asked a few hard questions but Nesbitt either didn't answer the questions at all or gave really flippant answers. I wonder who the groups are that will receive the "grants" and what existing connections those groups have to DOH.
Allen left early? Does he even pretend to care?
Anonymous wrote:Allen didn't stay for the whole meeting but while he was there he seemed to be the only one questioning the approach. Grosso asked a few hard questions but Nesbitt either didn't answer the questions at all or gave really flippant answers. I wonder who the groups are that will receive the "grants" and what existing connections those groups have to DOH.