Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Homeland Security and Intelligence department has formally lodged a protest against Russia that they hacked to meddle with US elections.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/07/politics/us-blames-russia-for-targeting-election-systems/index.html

“Lodged a protest.” Exactly what good will that do? Sorry, but Obama has been impotent when it comes to Russia. And, just to remind you - Romney tried to warn him but he laughed it off...... “The 1980s are now calling to ask for their foreign policy back because the Cold War’s been over for 20 years.” - President Obama at the debates, 2012

So rather you want Russian Trojan horse who wants to dismantle NATO on Russia's order to be president? Putin will be happy to give TRUMP free land for his plaza in exchange for removing sanctions and weakening NATO.

I would rather have a president who shows a little leadership and puts Putin, et al, in their place. That’s not who we have now. And, it won’t be Clinton.

Clinton is tougher than Obama. Trump's too easy for Putin to manipulate.

She's ruthless about lining her own deep pockets. Truth.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Homeland Security and Intelligence department has formally lodged a protest against Russia that they hacked to meddle with US elections.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/07/politics/us-blames-russia-for-targeting-election-systems/index.html

“Lodged a protest.” Exactly what good will that do? Sorry, but Obama has been impotent when it comes to Russia. And, just to remind you - Romney tried to warn him but he laughed it off...... “The 1980s are now calling to ask for their foreign policy back because the Cold War’s been over for 20 years.” - President Obama at the debates, 2012

So rather you want Russian Trojan horse who wants to dismantle NATO on Russia's order to be president? Putin will be happy to give TRUMP free land for his plaza in exchange for removing sanctions and weakening NATO.

I would rather have a president who shows a little leadership and puts Putin, et al, in their place. That’s not who we have now. And, it won’t be Clinton.

And Putin worshipper, Trump will? LMAO!

Again...what a year to have Trump up to bat, huh? Bush, Rubio, and Kasich must be kicking themselves. Romney too.

Anonymous wrote:Not one credible source has evidence or even reported that Wikileaks dumps are altered or fake. Try a different defense CTR interns

Don't even know what "CTR" stands for. And I just posted two links that show some of those effected by the dumps have noted their emails were altered. You can chose not to believe them. Just simply own that you trust the anon Russian hackers who have no agenda but truth seeking over their claims.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Homeland Security and Intelligence department has formally lodged a protest against Russia that they hacked to meddle with US elections.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/07/politics/us-blames-russia-for-targeting-election-systems/index.html

“Lodged a protest.” Exactly what good will that do? Sorry, but Obama has been impotent when it comes to Russia. And, just to remind you - Romney tried to warn him but he laughed it off...... “The 1980s are now calling to ask for their foreign policy back because the Cold War’s been over for 20 years.” - President Obama at the debates, 2012

So rather you want Russian Trojan horse who wants to dismantle NATO on Russia's order to be president? Putin will be happy to give TRUMP free land for his plaza in exchange for removing sanctions and weakening NATO.

I would rather have a president who shows a little leadership and puts Putin, et al, in their place. That’s not who we have now. And, it won’t be Clinton.

Clinton is tougher than Obama. Trump's too easy for Putin to manipulate.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Homeland Security and Intelligence department has formally lodged a protest against Russia that they hacked to meddle with US elections.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/07/politics/us-blames-russia-for-targeting-election-systems/index.html

“Lodged a protest.” Exactly what good will that do? Sorry, but Obama has been impotent when it comes to Russia. And, just to remind you - Romney tried to warn him but he laughed it off...... “The 1980s are now calling to ask for their foreign policy back because the Cold War’s been over for 20 years.” - President Obama at the debates, 2012

So rather you want Russian Trojan horse who wants to dismantle NATO on Russia's order to be president? Putin will be happy to give TRUMP free land for his plaza in exchange for removing sanctions and weakening NATO.

I would rather have a president who shows a little leadership and puts Putin, et al, in their place. That’s not who we have now. And, it won’t be Clinton.

Puts Putin in his place? When China snubbed Obama, you'd prefer that he take his toys and go home?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Homeland Security and Intelligence department has formally lodged a protest against Russia that they hacked to meddle with US elections.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/07/politics/us-blames-russia-for-targeting-election-systems/index.html

“Lodged a protest.” Exactly what good will that do? Sorry, but Obama has been impotent when it comes to Russia. And, just to remind you - Romney tried to warn him but he laughed it off...... “The 1980s are now calling to ask for their foreign policy back because the Cold War’s been over for 20 years.” - President Obama at the debates, 2012

So rather you want Russian Trojan horse who wants to dismantle NATO on Russia's order to be president? Putin will be happy to give TRUMP free land for his plaza in exchange for removing sanctions and weakening NATO.

I would rather have a president who shows a little leadership and puts Putin, et al, in their place. That’s not who we have now. And, it won’t be Clinton.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Homeland Security and Intelligence department has formally lodged a protest against Russia that they hacked to meddle with US elections.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/07/politics/us-blames-russia-for-targeting-election-systems/index.html

“Lodged a protest.” Exactly what good will that do? Sorry, but Obama has been impotent when it comes to Russia. And, just to remind you - Romney tried to warn him but he laughed it off...... “The 1980s are now calling to ask for their foreign policy back because the Cold War’s been over for 20 years.” - President Obama at the debates, 2012

So rather you want Russian Trojan horse who wants to dismantle NATO on Russia's order to be president? Putin will be happy to give TRUMP free land for his plaza in exchange for removing sanctions and weakening NATO.

Anonymous wrote:Homeland Security and Intelligence department has formally lodged a protest against Russia that they hacked to meddle with US elections.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/07/politics/us-blames-russia-for-targeting-election-systems/index.html

“Lodged a protest.” Exactly what good will that do? Sorry, but Obama has been impotent when it comes to Russia. And, just to remind you - Romney tried to warn him but he laughed it off...... “The 1980s are now calling to ask for their foreign policy back because the Cold War’s been over for 20 years.” - President Obama at the debates, 2012

Anonymous wrote:Hillary has already sold out.

You are selling the country to Russia because US Intelligence says Russia has hacked to meddle with US elections. Are you with Russia or with USA director of intelligence?

Homeland Security and Intelligence department has formally lodged a protest against Russia that they hacked to meddle with US elections.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/07/politics/us-blames-russia-for-targeting-election-systems/index.html

And, let’s not forget that little “live mic” incident with Obama and Russian President Medvedev.....




Hillary has some ‘splaining to do.

Hillary has already sold out.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^ CTR is now on DCUM.

Are you disputing that there has been evidence that some emails, throughout this summer, have been modified, misattributed, or wholly created?

As they say, facts have a liberal bias, apparently.

I'm a Clinton supporter, but unfortunately, Clinton has not denied the substance of any leaks so far, so we have to assume they are accurate so far. The best news for Clinton is that this came on a day where Trump's rude locker room behavior is making bigger headlines.

X [sound from family feud]

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/07/the-muscovite-candidate/492884/

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2016/7/26/1552616/-Russian-Hackers-Altered-Emails-Before-Release-to-Wikileaks

Alter emails? then leak them slowly throughout the election cycle? Why would anyone do that?

Because Russia wants trump to be president so he will remove the sanctions and allow Russia to annex whoever they want. All Trump will ask is TRUMP Plaza in Moscow. These are not isolated events. It is not without reason that trump wants to weaken NATO. Trump truly will sell anything for his own profit. America has a trojan horse candidate of Russia.

Not one credible source has evidence or even reported that Wikileaks dumps are altered or fake. Try a different defense CTR interns

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^ CTR is now on DCUM.

Are you disputing that there has been evidence that some emails, throughout this summer, have been modified, misattributed, or wholly created?

As they say, facts have a liberal bias, apparently.

I'm a Clinton supporter, but unfortunately, Clinton has not denied the substance of any leaks so far, so we have to assume they are accurate so far. The best news for Clinton is that this came on a day where Trump's rude locker room behavior is making bigger headlines.

X [sound from family feud]

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/07/the-muscovite-candidate/492884/

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2016/7/26/1552616/-Russian-Hackers-Altered-Emails-Before-Release-to-Wikileaks

I'm aware of that, but politically speaking it's irrelevant if the campaign itself does not deny the contents of the leak.

How much sense would it make for the campaign to get into a truth battle with Russians hackers over elements of certain emails? Better just to ignore, or deal with the bad thats actually true. Thats what shes doing.