Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What do you base the suggestion that he paid taxes subsequently on? He can legally take that offset for 15 years after the fact, which would be to 2010. Given the additional bankruptcies and the fact that he has been funneling money through his foundation would suggest he is continuing to be a genius and limit his liability to the rest of the Americans who do pay taxes.

You are an idiot for given this liar the benefit of any doubt. He has earned nothing in the way of trust or goodwill.

And more ad hominems

Do you have evidence he didn't? After creating the most successful financial turnaround in history, there's a more than likely chance those exemptions were removed. Face it, he used the laws passed by politicians during the Clinton Presidency to regain his wealth. Liberals hate successful people as a whole, the occupy movement shows that.

You should do more research and think critically for once. You appear to be ignorant and foolish.

Apple and Steve Jobs made the biggest turnaround in history. IBM and Lou gerstner made another big turnaround. Below is a list of the largest corporate turnarounds. Donald Trump as usual is unknown in real corportate world. Nobody knows if he actually made any turnaround at all because we don't have his tax returns. Are you saying you take Trump's word. Believe the liar, right, especially serial liar.

https://www.fastcompany.com/3042431/meme/the-biggest-business-comebacks-of-the-past-20-years

Anonymous wrote:If Trump had taken his inheritance and put it into index funds, he would be 6 times richer than he claims to be today. I am guessing the real number is actually more like 20 times richer, because I highly doubt he is anywhere close to a billionaire.

The man is nothing more than a flim flam artist.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What do you base the suggestion that he paid taxes subsequently on? He can legally take that offset for 15 years after the fact, which would be to 2010. Given the additional bankruptcies and the fact that he has been funneling money through his foundation would suggest he is continuing to be a genius and limit his liability to the rest of the Americans who do pay taxes.

You are an idiot for given this liar the benefit of any doubt. He has earned nothing in the way of trust or goodwill.

And more ad hominems

Do you have evidence he didn't? After creating the most successful financial turnaround in history, there's a more than likely chance those exemptions were removed. Face it, he used the laws passed by politicians during the Clinton Presidency to regain his wealth. Liberals hate successful people as a whole, the occupy movement shows that.

You should do more research and think critically for once. You appear to be ignorant and foolish.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What do you base the suggestion that he paid taxes subsequently on? He can legally take that offset for 15 years after the fact, which would be to 2010. Given the additional bankruptcies and the fact that he has been funneling money through his foundation would suggest he is continuing to be a genius and limit his liability to the rest of the Americans who do pay taxes.

You are an idiot for given this liar the benefit of any doubt. He has earned nothing in the way of trust or goodwill.

And more ad hominems

Do you have evidence he didn't? After creating the most successful financial turnaround in history, there's a more than likely chance those exemptions were removed. Face it, he used the laws passed by politicians during the Clinton Presidency to regain his wealth. Liberals hate successful people as a whole, the occupy movement shows that.

You should do more research and think critically for once. You appear to be ignorant and foolish.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yep lets attack Trump not the politicians like Hillary who wrote the laws.

When was this deduction taken?

When was Hillary first elected to the Senate?

kthanks.

But her husband was President and signed the law...so she supports this as she said she'd consult her husband on economic issues..

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This article is a good summary of my thoughts, particularly about his goals for a revamped tax code

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/10/02/the-most-shocking-part-of-donald-trumps-tax-records-isnt-the-916-million-loss-everyones-talking-about/

Sad you can't come up with your own ideas, shows you lack critical thinking skills.

Trump used the system as it was written and he was lawful. The thing is, he's also very business smart. He wrote in his own book about the losses he took and how he recovered from them. He's in the Guiness Book or Records for biggest finnancial turnaround:

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/brainstorm/200905/donald-trump-failure

More to point, he's better for us and the economy than Clinton. Clinton is beholden to large roch Wall Street donors. She's supported big banks and hedge funds, supports TPP (she said she doesn't because its unpopular but she will), and has a horrible record as a government official. Her accomplishments as a civil secant include a failed Russian diplomatic effort, chaos in the ME by supporting radical Islamists overthrowing in some instances regimes that were friendly to our interests and of course getting diplomats killed. The extent of her forgiven policy adventures are her lying about taking sniper fire.

Trump wants the economy to work and it's been the forefront of his campaign with immigration reform. I don't agree with everything he says or every stupid tweet. I know he's miles above HRC on economic issues and he'll actually tackle immigration

What a good little lapdog!

Libs ALWAYS resort to insults when they have nothing to say.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What do you base the suggestion that he paid taxes subsequently on? He can legally take that offset for 15 years after the fact, which would be to 2010. Given the additional bankruptcies and the fact that he has been funneling money through his foundation would suggest he is continuing to be a genius and limit his liability to the rest of the Americans who do pay taxes.

You are an idiot for given this liar the benefit of any doubt. He has earned nothing in the way of trust or goodwill.

And more ad hominems

Do you have evidence he didn't? After creating the most successful financial turnaround in history, there's a more than likely chance those exemptions were removed. Face it, he used the laws passed by politicians during the Clinton Presidency to regain his wealth. Liberals hate successful people as a whole, the occupy movement shows that.

You should do more research and think critically for once. You appear to be ignorant and foolish.

Except he didn't. And you are beyond gullible

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This article is a good summary of my thoughts, particularly about his goals for a revamped tax code

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/10/02/the-most-shocking-part-of-donald-trumps-tax-records-isnt-the-916-million-loss-everyones-talking-about/

Sad you can't come up with your own ideas, shows you lack critical thinking skills.

Trump used the system as it was written and he was lawful. The thing is, he's also very business smart. He wrote in his own book about the losses he took and how he recovered from them. He's in the Guiness Book or Records for biggest finnancial turnaround:

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/brainstorm/200905/donald-trump-failure

More to point, he's better for us and the economy than Clinton. Clinton is beholden to large roch Wall Street donors. She's supported big banks and hedge funds, supports TPP (she said she doesn't because its unpopular but she will), and has a horrible record as a government official. Her accomplishments as a civil secant include a failed Russian diplomatic effort, chaos in the ME by supporting radical Islamists overthrowing in some instances regimes that were friendly to our interests and of course getting diplomats killed. The extent of her forgiven policy adventures are her lying about taking sniper fire.

Trump wants the economy to work and it's been the forefront of his campaign with immigration reform. I don't agree with everything he says or every stupid tweet. I know he's miles above HRC on economic issues and he'll actually tackle immigration

What a good little lapdog!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What do you base the suggestion that he paid taxes subsequently on? He can legally take that offset for 15 years after the fact, which would be to 2010. Given the additional bankruptcies and the fact that he has been funneling money through his foundation would suggest he is continuing to be a genius and limit his liability to the rest of the Americans who do pay taxes.

You are an idiot for given this liar the benefit of any doubt. He has earned nothing in the way of trust or goodwill.

And more ad hominems

Do you have evidence he didn't? After creating the most successful financial turnaround in history, there's a more than likely chance those exemptions were removed. Face it, he used the laws passed by politicians during the Clinton Presidency to regain his wealth. Liberals hate successful people as a whole, the occupy movement shows that.

You should do more research and think critically for once. You appear to be ignorant and foolish.

Anonymous wrote:What do you base the suggestion that he paid taxes subsequently on? He can legally take that offset for 15 years after the fact, which would be to 2010. Given the additional bankruptcies and the fact that he has been funneling money through his foundation would suggest he is continuing to be a genius and limit his liability to the rest of the Americans who do pay taxes.

You are an idiot for given this liar the benefit of any doubt. He has earned nothing in the way of trust or goodwill.