Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They don't want to get to know her, because that might challenge their deep misogyny.

Its just boggles my mind that many do not want to know Clinton, neither they want to truly understand Trump's despicable past, yet will claim Trump will save the world from the satanic Hillary.

Being critical of her, or not liking her, does NOT mean you like or support Trump.

You have two choices. If you don't vote Clinton, you are supporting Trump. Actions speak louder than words.

pp here.

No, it isn't support of Trump.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They don't want to get to know her, because that might challenge their deep misogyny.

Its just boggles my mind that many do not want to know Clinton, neither they want to truly understand Trump's despicable past, yet will claim Trump will save the world from the satanic Hillary.

Being critical of her, or not liking her, does NOT mean you like or support Trump.

You have two choices. If you don't vote Clinton, you are supporting Trump. Actions speak louder than words.

These little scare tactics don't sway me and I plan to vote Stein. Hillary's Iraq War vote and years pro-intervention foriegn policy have convinced me she lacks the temperament to be President.

You seem like you do not support Trump, even though you do not want to vote for Hillary. What does voting Stein achieve? Do you think Stein can win the election? Are you okay risking the Supreme court pick or total lack of respect for environment by voting for Stein and implicitly voting against semi-liberal candidate?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They don't want to get to know her, because that might challenge their deep misogyny.

Its just boggles my mind that many do not want to know Clinton, neither they want to truly understand Trump's despicable past, yet will claim Trump will save the world from the satanic Hillary.

Being critical of her, or not liking her, does NOT mean you like or support Trump.

You have two choices. If you don't vote Clinton, you are supporting Trump. Actions speak louder than words.

These little scare tactics don't sway me and I plan to vote Stein. Hillary's Iraq War vote and years pro-intervention foriegn policy have convinced me she lacks the temperament to be President.

Not a scare tactic. Like I said, actions speak louder than words.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They don't want to get to know her, because that might challenge their deep misogyny.

Its just boggles my mind that many do not want to know Clinton, neither they want to truly understand Trump's despicable past, yet will claim Trump will save the world from the satanic Hillary.

Being critical of her, or not liking her, does NOT mean you like or support Trump.

You have two choices. If you don't vote Clinton, you are supporting Trump. Actions speak louder than words.

These little scare tactics don't sway me and I plan to vote Stein. Hillary's Iraq War vote and years pro-intervention foriegn policy have convinced me she lacks the temperament to be President.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They don't want to get to know her, because that might challenge their deep misogyny.

Its just boggles my mind that many do not want to know Clinton, neither they want to truly understand Trump's despicable past, yet will claim Trump will save the world from the satanic Hillary.

Being critical of her, or not liking her, does NOT mean you like or support Trump.

You have two choices. If you don't vote Clinton, you are supporting Trump. Actions speak louder than words.

No way I can support Clinton. No way.
Hers would be the most corrupt, least transparent, and worst administration in history.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They don't want to get to know her, because that might challenge their deep misogyny.

Its just boggles my mind that many do not want to know Clinton, neither they want to truly understand Trump's despicable past, yet will claim Trump will save the world from the satanic Hillary.

Being critical of her, or not liking her, does NOT mean you like or support Trump.

You have two choices. If you don't vote Clinton, you are supporting Trump. Actions speak louder than words.

Anonymous wrote:I've read many similar accounts. She's regarded as genuine, diligent and funny by people who have met her. She was well liked and respected in the Senate even by Republicans who were impressed with her work ethic.

This. I read something similar in CQ a few months ago.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not greedy? Really? How do you explain the gouging to colleges for speaking fees?

I do a job - I ask for a payment and if someone is willing to pay for it, I do not consider that gouging. Clinton charging speaking fees is not her fault. If the university were willing to pay the fee, what did she do wrong?

She simply adds to the debt load of the poor students. What's wrong with that?

So, without her charging for speaking fee the college tuition would have gone down? Wow! She should be elected President so that she cannot charge speaking fee and debt load for students would automatically go down.

This is what happens when people without understanding of what happens in real world propose solutions. Big guest speaker fees are sponsored by Alumni networks so the students get exposure to leaders, thinkers, innovators and business people when they are studying. I regularly donate to one of the big name University alumni association and we organize events that brings big speakers to the campus.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not greedy? Really? How do you explain the gouging to colleges for speaking fees?

I do a job - I ask for a payment and if someone is willing to pay for it, I do not consider that gouging. Clinton charging speaking fees is not her fault. If the university were willing to pay the fee, what did she do wrong?

She simply adds to the debt load of the poor students. What's wrong with that?

So, without her charging for speaking fee the college tuition would have gone down? Wow! She should be elected President so that she cannot charge speaking fee and debt load for students would automatically go down.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not greedy? Really? How do you explain the gouging to colleges for speaking fees?

I do a job - I ask for a payment and if someone is willing to pay for it, I do not consider that gouging. Clinton charging speaking fees is not her fault. If the university were willing to pay the fee, what did she do wrong?

She simply adds to the debt load of the poor students. What's wrong with that?

Ha. Close enough attention.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They don't want to get to know her, because that might challenge their deep misogyny.

Its just boggles my mind that many do not want to know Clinton, neither they want to truly understand Trump's despicable past, yet will claim Trump will save the world from the satanic Hillary.

I’ve been around long enough and paid attention closely enough to know that she is corrupt as hell, divisive as can be, and lacks the judgment to serve as president.

Paid close encounters up attention to what? What the media has said about her? Oh my gosh, well, they certainly never pick a side to a story and stick with it, and Hillary has certainly never been inaccurately cast by the media in the role of wicked witch.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They don't want to get to know her, because that might challenge their deep misogyny.

Its just boggles my mind that many do not want to know Clinton, neither they want to truly understand Trump's despicable past, yet will claim Trump will save the world from the satanic Hillary.

Being critical of her, or not liking her, does NOT mean you like or support Trump.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They don't want to get to know her, because that might challenge their deep misogyny.

So, this is like Jeopardy, you had an answer you wanted to give and created the question.

PP you responded to. Your response doesn't make any sense. Are you presuming I'm also the OP?

O'Hanlon is not even remotely objective when it comes to Hillary.

Google his name in conjunction with that of Clinton and you will see numerous articles that sing her praises and ignore her failures.