Anonymous
09/10/2016 21:43
Subject: It seems like every 'supermodel' is the daughter of a celebrity these days . . .
I agree that the children of celebrities thing is getting old. I also agree with PPs who think Kendall fits into the industry despite her family's connections.
However, I doubt she would be a successful model without those connection. There are lots of tall, beautiful women in the world who fit the physical profile of being a successful model.
However, I doubt she would be a successful model without those connection. There are lots of tall, beautiful women in the world who fit the physical profile of being a successful model.
Anonymous
09/10/2016 19:45
Subject: It seems like every 'supermodel' is the daughter of a celebrity these days . . .
Yes, Cindy Crawford's daughter is amazingly beautiful. Just like her mom.
Anonymous
09/10/2016 19:38
Subject: It seems like every 'supermodel' is the daughter of a celebrity these days . . .
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Cindy Crawford, Yolanda Foster, Stephen Baldwin, Kartrashian, Lisa Rinna, Johnnie Depp, Mick Jagger, the list goes on and on
Seems unfair to the girls struggling to find work and make it in the industry
Do you think if these girls did not have famous parents, they would be so successful in the modeling world?
I don't think the ones you mentioned would have made it on their own. The Baldwin, Depp and Jagger girls are butter face. Cindy's girl is not exactly the chip off the block. Not at all stunning like the mom. Hadid girls are not that special. They made it due to their connections. Only one that could have made it on her own merits is Kendall Jenner.
I think crawford's daughter is every bit as stunning as her mom....if not more so!
Anonymous
09/10/2016 19:31
Subject: It seems like every 'supermodel' is the daughter of a celebrity these days . . .
Ireland Baldwin is beautiful.
Anonymous
09/10/2016 19:28
Subject: It seems like every 'supermodel' is the daughter of a celebrity these days . . .
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Kendall Jenner is naturally beautiful and built like a model. Her covers and ads are gorgeous, and she's great on the runway.
She is plain. She is not "creature" like or extraordinary, she's just tall.
Well, apparently the fashion industry disagrees.
Actually it famously agrees and she has been bullied for model "inadequacies" but where there is money to be made, everyone is a whore in that business.
Huh. August 2016 Vogue says she's the breakout model of her generation...and she's on multiple covers around the globe this month and next.
People are hating because she's linked to the Kardashians. And that's not really fair. She's pretty, has a model's figure, and is doing well in the industry.
I realize she's not everyone's cup of tea, but neither were the supermodels back in the day. I always thought Kate Moss looked rather ordinary. I always thought Cindy Crawford and Elle McPherson were gorgeous, but they weren't very model-y (more "hot girl nextdoor" than anorexic heroin-chic glamazon).
Kendall looks like a model. She has the body and striking facial features coupled with the vacant look.
Are you a tween?
I'm nearly 42.
Why do you hate Kendall so much? It's weird.
I don't hate anyone except Adolf Hitler and dictators of the same ilk. Maybe you care too much about this shit.
Anonymous
09/10/2016 19:20
Subject: Re:It seems like every 'supermodel' is the daughter of a celebrity these days . . .
Kaia and Kendall are the only ones I find to be beautiful.
Anonymous
09/10/2016 16:33
Subject: It seems like every 'supermodel' is the daughter of a celebrity these days . . .
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Kendall Jenner is naturally beautiful and built like a model. Her covers and ads are gorgeous, and she's great on the runway.
She is plain. She is not "creature" like or extraordinary, she's just tall.
Well, apparently the fashion industry disagrees.
Actually it famously agrees and she has been bullied for model "inadequacies" but where there is money to be made, everyone is a whore in that business.
Huh. August 2016 Vogue says she's the breakout model of her generation...and she's on multiple covers around the globe this month and next.
People are hating because she's linked to the Kardashians. And that's not really fair. She's pretty, has a model's figure, and is doing well in the industry.
I realize she's not everyone's cup of tea, but neither were the supermodels back in the day. I always thought Kate Moss looked rather ordinary. I always thought Cindy Crawford and Elle McPherson were gorgeous, but they weren't very model-y (more "hot girl nextdoor" than anorexic heroin-chic glamazon).
Kendall looks like a model. She has the body and striking facial features coupled with the vacant look.
NP here and the bolded is why I can't get on the Kendall Jenner train. She is beautiful, but is so boring! The supermodels of yesteryear had a spark about them that truly elevated them from a working model. Gigi is not as beautiful but at least she's not like a wet rag.
Anonymous
09/10/2016 15:12
Subject: It seems like every 'supermodel' is the daughter of a celebrity these days . . .
Meh. I can't stand the kardashian's, but at least Kendall is trying to have a real career rather than sit around and take mindless selfies all day. Seems like she genuinely wants to be a high fashion model and works pretty hard.
Anonymous
09/10/2016 14:21
Subject: It seems like every 'supermodel' is the daughter of a celebrity these days . . .
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Kendall Jenner is naturally beautiful and built like a model. Her covers and ads are gorgeous, and she's great on the runway.
She is plain. She is not "creature" like or extraordinary, she's just tall.
I completely disagree. She has a "high fashion" look to her, and a gorgeous, distinctive face. Definitely model material, even without the Jenner/Kartrashian connection.
Anonymous
09/10/2016 13:21
Subject: It seems like every 'supermodel' is the daughter of a celebrity these days . . .
Kate Moss = 5'7" (short!)
Cindy Crawford = 5'9" (short for a runway model)
Kendall = 5'10.5" (tall enough for the runway)
Cindy Crawford = 5'9" (short for a runway model)
Kendall = 5'10.5" (tall enough for the runway)
Anonymous
09/10/2016 13:18
Subject: It seems like every 'supermodel' is the daughter of a celebrity these days . . .
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Kendall Jenner is naturally beautiful and built like a model. Her covers and ads are gorgeous, and she's great on the runway.
She is plain. She is not "creature" like or extraordinary, she's just tall.
Well, apparently the fashion industry disagrees.
Actually it famously agrees and she has been bullied for model "inadequacies" but where there is money to be made, everyone is a whore in that business.
Huh. August 2016 Vogue says she's the breakout model of her generation...and she's on multiple covers around the globe this month and next.
People are hating because she's linked to the Kardashians. And that's not really fair. She's pretty, has a model's figure, and is doing well in the industry.
I realize she's not everyone's cup of tea, but neither were the supermodels back in the day. I always thought Kate Moss looked rather ordinary. I always thought Cindy Crawford and Elle McPherson were gorgeous, but they weren't very model-y (more "hot girl nextdoor" than anorexic heroin-chic glamazon).
Kendall looks like a model. She has the body and striking facial features coupled with the vacant look.
Are you a tween?
I'm nearly 42.
Why do you hate Kendall so much? It's weird.
Anonymous
09/10/2016 13:14
Subject: It seems like every 'supermodel' is the daughter of a celebrity these days . . .
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Kendall Jenner is naturally beautiful and built like a model. Her covers and ads are gorgeous, and she's great on the runway.
She is plain. She is not "creature" like or extraordinary, she's just tall.
Well, apparently the fashion industry disagrees.
Actually it famously agrees and she has been bullied for model "inadequacies" but where there is money to be made, everyone is a whore in that business.
Are you thinking of Gigi? She does not have a runway model's body and was bullied for it. I would say Kendall is doing well in spite of her family, not because of it. I think she makes the most of the models listed by the OP and is the model most suited for runway.
Anonymous
09/10/2016 12:59
Subject: It seems like every 'supermodel' is the daughter of a celebrity these days . . .
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Kendall Jenner is naturally beautiful and built like a model. Her covers and ads are gorgeous, and she's great on the runway.
She is plain. She is not "creature" like or extraordinary, she's just tall.
Well, apparently the fashion industry disagrees.
Actually it famously agrees and she has been bullied for model "inadequacies" but where there is money to be made, everyone is a whore in that business.
Huh. August 2016 Vogue says she's the breakout model of her generation...and she's on multiple covers around the globe this month and next.
People are hating because she's linked to the Kardashians. And that's not really fair. She's pretty, has a model's figure, and is doing well in the industry.
I realize she's not everyone's cup of tea, but neither were the supermodels back in the day. I always thought Kate Moss looked rather ordinary. I always thought Cindy Crawford and Elle McPherson were gorgeous, but they weren't very model-y (more "hot girl nextdoor" than anorexic heroin-chic glamazon).
Kendall looks like a model. She has the body and striking facial features coupled with the vacant look.
Are you a tween?
Anonymous
09/10/2016 12:56
Subject: It seems like every 'supermodel' is the daughter of a celebrity these days . . .
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Kendall Jenner is naturally beautiful and built like a model. Her covers and ads are gorgeous, and she's great on the runway.
She is plain. She is not "creature" like or extraordinary, she's just tall.
Well, apparently the fashion industry disagrees.
Actually it famously agrees and she has been bullied for model "inadequacies" but where there is money to be made, everyone is a whore in that business.
Huh. August 2016 Vogue says she's the breakout model of her generation...and she's on multiple covers around the globe this month and next.
People are hating because she's linked to the Kardashians. And that's not really fair. She's pretty, has a model's figure, and is doing well in the industry.
I realize she's not everyone's cup of tea, but neither were the supermodels back in the day. I always thought Kate Moss looked rather ordinary. I always thought Cindy Crawford and Elle McPherson were gorgeous, but they weren't very model-y (more "hot girl nextdoor" than anorexic heroin-chic glamazon).
Kendall looks like a model. She has the body and striking facial features coupled with the vacant look.
Anonymous
09/10/2016 12:18
Subject: It seems like every 'supermodel' is the daughter of a celebrity these days . . .
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Kendall Jenner is naturally beautiful and built like a model. Her covers and ads are gorgeous, and she's great on the runway.
She is plain. She is not "creature" like or extraordinary, she's just tall.
Well, apparently the fashion industry disagrees.
Actually it famously agrees and she has been bullied for model "inadequacies" but where there is money to be made, everyone is a whore in that business.