Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If it makes you feel better, Lafayette had 20 kids in a class and still only 53% tested proficient in English.
I don't get it.
your kids are in that school. Are they learning a lot and thriving academically? If so the test is flawed!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Caucasian kids overall at Hearst destroyed the test last year. 86% at 4+ for ELA and 89% at 4+ for math. Can't breakdown by class because the classes are so small. Big gains for the other populations there too. Great job owls! No substitute for small class sizes.
Uh, except the results for the only other race breakout at Hearst (AA) are horribly disparate from the white students. I find that concerning when other schools in the area seem to do significantly better with the achievement gap between races.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who cares? It is just a test.
Yes, a test of proficiency in English Language Arts.
Anonymous wrote:If it makes you feel better, Lafayette had 20 kids in a class and still only 53% tested proficient in English.
I don't get it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Caucasian kids overall at Hearst destroyed the test last year. 86% at 4+ for ELA and 89% at 4+ for math. Can't breakdown by class because the classes are so small. Big gains for the other populations there too. Great job owls! No substitute for small class sizes.
Uh, except the results for the only other race breakout at Hearst (AA) are horribly disparate from the white students. I find that concerning when other schools in the area seem to do significantly better with the achievement gap between races.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who cares? It is just a test.
I care because I'm a parent and a tax payer. I don't personally care about test scores, per se, but the District government roped our families and our children into this test, which many declare as worthless. This test required tons of instruction time to prep for. This test cost our city coffers millions....millions that could be spent on other education-related expenses.
Anonymous wrote:The Caucasian kids overall at Hearst destroyed the test last year. 86% at 4+ for ELA and 89% at 4+ for math. Can't breakdown by class because the classes are so small. Big gains for the other populations there too. Great job owls! No substitute for small class sizes.
Anonymous wrote:Could it be simply the learning curve for a computer based test between 3rd and 4th?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If it makes you feel better, Lafayette had 20 kids in a class and still only 53% tested proficient in English.
I don't get it.
Eaton also had the same issue. The other grades tested significantly higher (83 and 82%), but only 50% in 3rd grade.
Anonymous wrote:If it makes you feel better, Lafayette had 20 kids in a class and still only 53% tested proficient in English.
I don't get it.