Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I scored 170 on my LSAT and went to a top 10 law school. I was never that good at, or interested in, actual puzzles. Part of the issue for me is that I have no depth perception due to eye surgery/strabismus.
Funny, a lot of lawyers on this board this morning!I scored a 174 on the LSAT, and had a perfect score on all but the #$@#$ games section. I've never liked puzzles either. I think it's just a different style of thinking that dominates. I have very fast processing speed for verbal information, but very slooooww processing speed for spatial information. Hubby is the converse. He has a harder time on standardized test sections that involve reading and critical analysis, while he LOOOOVED the LSAT games and could do them a lot faster than me.
I got all of the logic games questions correct. I wasn't nearly as good at the verbal reasoning. And I am bad at regular puzzles! But good at word problems/puzzles. Totally different skills for me.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I scored 170 on my LSAT and went to a top 10 law school. I was never that good at, or interested in, actual puzzles. Part of the issue for me is that I have no depth perception due to eye surgery/strabismus.
Funny, a lot of lawyers on this board this morning!I scored a 174 on the LSAT, and had a perfect score on all but the #$@#$ games section. I've never liked puzzles either. I think it's just a different style of thinking that dominates. I have very fast processing speed for verbal information, but very slooooww processing speed for spatial information. Hubby is the converse. He has a harder time on standardized test sections that involve reading and critical analysis, while he LOOOOVED the LSAT games and could do them a lot faster than me.