Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Didn't Assange say he was going to release more emails right before Clinton speaks at the DNC, for maximum effect? He hasn't done that yet, has he? Or was he just joking when he said that?
In 2010, Assange threatened to release dirt on Putin.
Putin threatened to release polonium in Assange.
Assange kept quiet and has gradually evolved into a stooge for Russia, even complaining that the Panama Papers were a dirty trick the West was releasing to embarrass Russia, even though the Panama Papers were pretty much the stock and trade of early Wikileaks.
As for the DNC mails, my understanding is that there was some Cyrilic metadata in some of the leaked documents indicating at least some documents were modified or at least opened up by Russian intelligence. When this was pointed out, subsequent leaks have lost the Cyrillic metadata. I suspect the general gist of the emails is true but a few of the truly repugnant emails were added by Russian intelligence for added effect, but have nothing to prove this.
I'd also suspect anything really really embarrassing stuff will get released the Thursday or maybe Friday before the election. Or, they'll just be at this level but designed to make some of those wavering between Stein and Clinton go towards Stein.
As I've asked on numerous other occasions, when has Wikileaks EVER embarrassed Putin/Russia? I mean, are the truly the most transparent country on the planet, in no need of the sunshine that Wikileaks provides?
I know the far-left "Bernie's too right wing" crowd still regards Wikileaks as some sort of guiding force bringing good to the world.
I'd like to think anyone to the right of Bernie would realize by now that Wikileaks is very selective in who they bring sunshine and transparency to.
Anonymous wrote:Trump asked Putin to hack DNC. Basically it is treason and this clown should not be running for President.
How does he know Putin anyways? Maybe it is the Melania connection? She is from the Eastern Bloc, you know.
I wonder if that DNC staffer who was killed in DC was actually assassinated by the KGB on Putin's orders? FBI should look at it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here's the thing - the Russians are notorious for mixing in real emails and faked ones. This is a known thing. So, now that Trump has basically publicly pledged allegiance to United Russia, there's going to be no way of knowing what's real and what isn't.
+1
It's a bit odd that everyone is reading these Wikileaks emails as if they are all 100% undoctored. That seems unlikely, really.
Yeah right ... Wiki leaks have full time staff doctoring emails.
DWS should get her job back. They are all doctored.
Umm, no. The emails were provided to Wikileaks -- they could have been (and likely were, if they were provided by Russian intelligence) doctored prior to being handed to Wikileaks for publishing. The hacker who claims credit for providing the emails to Wikileaks is Guccifer 2, who may be Romanian or may be Russian intelligence.
Interesting theory.
If this is true, why have we not heard ANYONE from the DNC disavow the ones that have been published?
(Hint: Because they didn’t doctor them. They didn’t have to. They speak for themselves.)
Falling over ourselves in desperation, aren't we now?![]()
Nope. I am actually just stating a fact. You like facts, don’t you?
Anonymous wrote:Trump asked Putin to hack DNC. Basically it is treason and this clown should not be running for President.
How does he know Putin anyways? Maybe it is the Melania connection? She is from the Eastern Bloc, you know.
I wonder if that DNC staffer who was killed in DC was actually assassinated by the KGB on Putin's orders? FBI should look at it.
Anonymous wrote:Trump asked Putin to hack DNC. Basically it is treason and this clown should not be running for President.
How does he know Putin anyways? Maybe it is the Melania connection? She is from the Eastern Bloc, you know.
I wonder if that DNC staffer who was killed in DC was actually assassinated by the KGB on Putin's orders? FBI should look at it.
Anonymous wrote:Didn't Assange say he was going to release more emails right before Clinton speaks at the DNC, for maximum effect? He hasn't done that yet, has he? Or was he just joking when he said that?
Anonymous wrote:Trump asked Putin to hack DNC. Basically it is treason and this clown should not be running for President.
How does he know Putin anyways? Maybe it is the Melania connection? She is from the Eastern Bloc, you know.
I wonder if that DNC staffer who was killed in DC was actually assassinated by the KGB on Putin's orders? FBI should look at it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here's the thing - the Russians are notorious for mixing in real emails and faked ones. This is a known thing. So, now that Trump has basically publicly pledged allegiance to United Russia, there's going to be no way of knowing what's real and what isn't.
+1
It's a bit odd that everyone is reading these Wikileaks emails as if they are all 100% undoctored. That seems unlikely, really.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here's the thing - the Russians are notorious for mixing in real emails and faked ones. This is a known thing. So, now that Trump has basically publicly pledged allegiance to United Russia, there's going to be no way of knowing what's real and what isn't.
+1
It's a bit odd that everyone is reading these Wikileaks emails as if they are all 100% undoctored. That seems unlikely, really.
Yeah right ... Wiki leaks have full time staff doctoring emails.
DWS should get her job back. They are all doctored.
Umm, no. The emails were provided to Wikileaks -- they could have been (and likely were, if they were provided by Russian intelligence) doctored prior to being handed to Wikileaks for publishing. The hacker who claims credit for providing the emails to Wikileaks is Guccifer 2, who may be Romanian or may be Russian intelligence.
Interesting theory.
If this is true, why have we not heard ANYONE from the DNC disavow the ones that have been published?
(Hint: Because they didn’t doctor them. They didn’t have to. They speak for themselves.)
Falling over ourselves in desperation, aren't we now?![]()