Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:PP, this is outdated talk. We are running out money fast, and China's growth is artificially propped by the Chinese Communists, so we know it will come down with a loud bang. Who will pay for the party then?
Funny thing, where do you think Europe will "seek leadership"? Genuinely curious who are the contenders
I don't know. Maybe we'll return to the individual nation states pre WW1...[/quote
How poorly educated are you? From the destruction of the Spanish Armada until ww1 the UK was the undisputed leader of the free world. Ww1 & the boer war was Germany trying to gain power. You have heard of the British Empire- you know the one that the sun never set on? Unlike other European colonial powers, the Brits worked with their territories, thus leaving a lot of them better off & still eager to be in the commonwealth. Russia can never be the leader of a 'free' world not can China b/c those nations aren't technically free. The EU will actually become more powerful, it also depends on how skillfully congress limits trump- if they are as good as they were with Obama we have nothing to worry about. This country is becoming more liberal, net migration will end & white people who are uncomfortable will keep moving away from urban centers & becoming more & more disenfranchised while those who are fine will have to actually work super hard b/c the US won't be benifitting from the developing worlds brain drain anymore.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The title of this thread should be changed.
I remember a couple of weeks ago a thread that was deleted because the title made fun of, I believe, Elizabeth Warren’s name.
LOL Don't even go there.
Talk about a fast descent of a political star. Elizabeth Warren's speech was so sleep inducing that I thought I had been shot with a poison arrow.
I am the poster of the message that this thread should be retitled. So, after 5 hours or so, nothing has been changed. And, I didn’t rely on you simply reading my comment, but I reported it as well.
Mr. Steele - I find it totally hypocritical of you to totally delete a thread referring to Warren (in the title) as Pocahontas (or some such name), yet you let this one stand.
There must be a very simple explanation..............
Anonymous wrote:...because it sure as hell won't be the US.
Germany? NATO as a whole? Can't be GB, they're on the brink of economic disaster and political fracture. Canada? No military big enough... So who? I bet Putin's salivating...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The title of this thread should be changed.
I remember a couple of weeks ago a thread that was deleted because the title made fun of, I believe, Elizabeth Warren’s name.
LOL Don't even go there.
Talk about a fast descent of a political star. Elizabeth Warren's speech was so sleep inducing that I thought I had been shot with a poison arrow.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The title of this thread should be changed.
I remember a couple of weeks ago a thread that was deleted because the title made fun of, I believe, Elizabeth Warren’s name.
LOL Don't even go there.
Anonymous wrote:This paranoia is tiring.
Anonymous wrote:Making up nicknames for politicians makes you sound like a fifth grader.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:...because it sure as hell won't be the US.
Germany? NATO as a whole? Can't be GB, they're on the brink of economic disaster and political fracture. Canada? No military big enough... So who? I bet Putin's salivating...
ok, so what are you saying - if trump wins (which i think is unlikely), the USA will be the sole superpower FOREVER? like until the sun explodes?
other countries are cathing up. sooner or later we won't be able to boss everyone around. in fact, even now we can't boss everyone. in the future our abilities will be even more limited.
Anonymous wrote:...because it sure as hell won't be the US.
Germany? NATO as a whole? Can't be GB, they're on the brink of economic disaster and political fracture. Canada? No military big enough... So who? I bet Putin's salivating...
Anonymous wrote:Right, OK.
Germany will be the leader of the free world.
I think you dramatically understate this country's importance, as well as the importance of the office. We could elect my 4 year old daughter's teddy bear and would still be the most important country in the world.