Anonymous wrote:Phew. I'm relieved. For 15 minutes, I've been panicking that I've been flashing the entire city of DC and leaving a trail of clucking women in my wake as they look at my inner thighs and "you-know-what."![]()
Pantyhose and slips are NOT required to look put-together and professional in a smart casual/business casual setting.
And to that fat-shamer who mentioned being able to tell that some woman was carrying extra pounds because she could see her shape under her dress---seriously? Fuck you. And go back to the 50s where women felt forced to corset their waists so they would meet the approval of jerks like you.
Anonymous wrote:I also haven't worn a slip since I was about 6 years old and I don't know any of my friends that do. I wear pants that aren't lined as well as dresses that aren't lined. Many of them are suit material and aren't see through. I've checked at home, in fluorescent lights at work, and been photographed even by the newspaper and you cannot see through. I'm also able to dress somewhat casually on some days at work and I wear dresses that are not jersey or some other flimsy fabric. They're shirtdresses (not cotton material though) or other work-appropriate fabrics. This is not an issue if you choose fabric wisely.
Seriously! I have been working in offices in NYC and downtown DC for 15+ years. I have hardly ever seen an example of these completely see-through work dresses that PPs decry. Not walking down a sunny street, not in the office, not on the metro, not in flash photography. (Perhaps I am just in the wrong field?) Pearl-clutching is one thing, but this is more like complete invention!
Anonymous wrote:OP, let me just tell you as a favor to you and women everywhere that they are not opaque. I see at least half a dozen women on my way to work every day that are not wearing slips and you can see EVERYTHING. It looks HORRIBLE. I really want to talk to them and teach them to wear a slip unless they have a FULLY lined skirt.
I also haven't worn a slip since I was about 6 years old and I don't know any of my friends that do. I wear pants that aren't lined as well as dresses that aren't lined. Many of them are suit material and aren't see through. I've checked at home, in fluorescent lights at work, and been photographed even by the newspaper and you cannot see through. I'm also able to dress somewhat casually on some days at work and I wear dresses that are not jersey or some other flimsy fabric. They're shirtdresses (not cotton material though) or other work-appropriate fabrics. This is not an issue if you choose fabric wisely.
) Pearl-clutching is one thing, but this is more like complete invention!Anonymous wrote:Totally don't care. I can tell if a man is wearing boxers (there's a line in the middle of the leg) or whitey tighties in many dress pants and it doesn't bother me one bit either.
Anonymous wrote:Sadly, I realized this the hard way--a lot of the skirts and dresses are almost see through now and it mostly only happens in certain types of lighting. So I can't tell at home, but...can see my underwear in other places.
So, I used to wear unlined dresses and skirts, but now I'm not sure it's a good idea unless I test them in different lighting. Heck, today I am wearing some of those thin jersey palazzo pants and just realized that you can see everything if I bend over. Oh well. I wear skin colored granny underwear and bras, so not such a big deal if it turns out to be visible.
It is really too hot to wear slips under everything.
Anonymous wrote:I'm a professional woman in her 40s and I don't know what you're talking about.
I wear dozens of "unlined" dresses. They are all dark or opaque colors/patterns. They are fairly thick poly blend washable things. While there is a tiny hint of VPL (visible panty line) or the equivalent with my bra, I'm 100% sure you can't tell what color they are, or see my thighs or anything else.
Is this a thing? Are women REALLY wearing slips under their dresses in the 90 degree heat as they walk upwards of a mile to get to and from metro/office/kids etc???
I'm not trying to be snarky.