Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here is the link. The DNC undermined Sanders. Democratic primary was rigged as the DNC was not impartial. This article describes the emails:
http://observer.com/2016/07/wikileaks-proves-primary-was-rigged-dnc-undermined-democracy/
This is not news. Sanders was never going to win. Another Democrat may have won against Clinton, but not Sanders.
Anonymous wrote:Here is the link. The DNC undermined Sanders. Democratic primary was rigged as the DNC was not impartial. This article describes the emails:
http://observer.com/2016/07/wikileaks-proves-primary-was-rigged-dnc-undermined-democracy/
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So wiki leaks had them, but not the FBI?
Who knows? It's a secret.
That apparently only OP knows. That tweet is dated 2 weeks ago, my guess is nothing came of it because there was nothing there
Nice distraction. The date of the release is a relevant the fact is there is 23,000 classified emails just to confidential classification. We noticed there is many top secret emails also released they're much more damaging
No, I think PP is right. If there were something to this, it would have come out weeks ago.
+1
And anyone who has worked with classified stuff knows that "classified" doesn't mean amazing top secrets that will blow your mind.
I have and understand TS means the disclosure of which causes exceptionally grave damage to national security. We know TS stuff was on her server and was disclosed to uncleared people.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So wiki leaks had them, but not the FBI?
Who knows? It's a secret.
That apparently only OP knows. That tweet is dated 2 weeks ago, my guess is nothing came of it because there was nothing there
Nice distraction. The date of the release is a relevant the fact is there is 23,000 classified emails just to confidential classification. We noticed there is many top secret emails also released they're much more damaging
No, I think PP is right. If there were something to this, it would have come out weeks ago.
+1
And anyone who has worked with classified stuff knows that "classified" doesn't mean amazing top secrets that will blow your mind.
I have and understand TS means the disclosure of which causes exceptionally grave damage to national security. We know TS stuff was on her server and was disclosed to uncleared people.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So wiki leaks had them, but not the FBI?
Who knows? It's a secret.
That apparently only OP knows. That tweet is dated 2 weeks ago, my guess is nothing came of it because there was nothing there
Nice distraction. The date of the release is a relevant the fact is there is 23,000 classified emails just to confidential classification. We noticed there is many top secret emails also released they're much more damaging
No, I think PP is right. If there were something to this, it would have come out weeks ago.
+1
And anyone who has worked with classified stuff knows that "classified" doesn't mean amazing top secrets that will blow your mind.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So wiki leaks had them, but not the FBI?
Who knows? It's a secret.
Everything is secret.
And that is the problem: the classification system was never intended to be used in the way it is being used.
Of course, it's difficult to investigate this abuse since virtually no journalists have clearance, and they could not reveal anything even if they did.
It is a break-down of the checks and balances system on which our republic was founded.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So wiki leaks had them, but not the FBI?
Who knows? It's a secret.